Laws of Mass Dynamics: Conservation & Transformation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the laws of thermodynamics, particularly focusing on the conservation of energy and the concept of increasing entropy. It highlights the need for a second law of mass dynamics to address the irreversible transformations of matter, such as the combustion of hydrocarbons and the waste generated from car tires. The conversation emphasizes that understanding energy in isolation is misleading, as it is inherently linked to the material it originates from. The transformation processes, like electrolysis and gravitational potential energy in water, illustrate the complexities involved in mass dynamics. The thread concludes with a request for professional references on "mass dynamics."
denisaf
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
The laws of thermodynamics deal with the irreversible flow of energy. Conservation of energy is the first law and increasing entropy (disorder) in an energy flow is the second. The conservation of mass is the equivalent first law for matter. It is commonly recognized. But what about the equivalent second law? For example, oil is a hydrocarbon liquid that is transformed to carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide and water vapor on combustion. That is an irreversible process that is contributing to climate change. Material in car tires is transformed into waste during operations. Many materials recycle naturally while some industrial materials are recycled. But, in my opinion, a second law of mass dynamics should take into account what happens to matter when it is transformed. Treating energy alone is misleading as energy is invariably a property of material and the energy being considered dependent on the operation being considered. The internal energy in water is the issue when electrolysis is used to transform water to oxygen and hydrogen. But it is the gravitational potential energy of water in a hydro pondage.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have a professional reference for "mass dynamics" then please send it to me by PM. Otherwise this thread is closed.
 
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top