Laws of motion question with constraint relations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving three blocks connected by strings and pulleys, focusing on their accelerations and tensions. Participants analyze the constraint equations and the relationship between the blocks' movements, questioning the assumption that tensions T1 and T2 are equal. There is confusion regarding the direction of accelerations and how they relate to the forces acting on the blocks. The calculated accelerations presented by the original poster do not match the book's answers, leading to a debate about the correctness of the assumptions made. Ultimately, the importance of consistent coordinate systems and the application of Newton's laws is emphasized in resolving the discrepancies.
capricornpeer
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find :
a) acceleration of 1 kg, 2kg and 3 kg blocks and
b) tensions T1 and T2

Note: In the figure, 1, 2 and 3 represent the masses of respective blocks in Kg. T1 and T2 represent tension in strings


Homework Equations


Newton's laws and constraint equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Considering the uppermost pulley as a reference point, I have taken distance to :
i) mass 1 as x1,
ii) mass 2 as x2,
iii) mass 3 as x3.

From constraint considerations, T1=T2= T(say)

keeping string lengths as constant gives a1+a2+a3=0 (after a bit of solving).

Final Equations :
1) constraint equation : a1+a2+a3=0
2) for block 1 : T = -a1
3) for block 2 : 2*g - T = 2*a2
4) for block 3 : 3*g - T = 3*a3

However, the problem is that ans given in the book (DC Pandey, Mechanics Vol.1) doesn't
match with my answer.

Answer given in the book : a1 = 560/51, a2 = 590/51, a3 = 530/51 , T = 560/51 (all in SI units)

Please discuss what answers you get and how.
 

Attachments

  • abc.jpg
    abc.jpg
    5.6 KB · Views: 880
Physics news on Phys.org
capricornpeer said:

The Attempt at a Solution


Considering the uppermost pulley as a reference point, I have taken distance to :
i) mass 1 as x1,
ii) mass 2 as x2,
iii) mass 3 as x3.

From constraint considerations, T1=T2= T(say)

keeping string lengths as constant gives

a1+a2+a3=0 (after a bit of solving).

There are two independent strings. Why should be the tension equal in them? It can be, but you should prove.

The whole system accelerates downward, why is the sum of the accelerations zero? It can be if you choose the direction of accelerations this way, but why do you say that a1 is opposite to the tension?
Show the direction of the accelerations.

Find relation between accelerations using the constraints for both strings.

ehild
 
Last edited:
I had proved that tensions are equal and just stated the result on the forum. I think that's pretty trivial to see. Apologies for that.

I have chosen the uppermost pulley as reference for displacements x1,x2 and x3. Now, the vector x1's tail is at this pulley and it points towards block 1. Therefore, the direction of a1 is horizontal and pointing towards block 1. Also, since the block 1 will move towards right, a1 will be negative and thus a2 and a3 should be positive. Thus, sum of accelerations can be zero.

Please can you find the constraint relation between accelerations and check if it is indeed
a1+a2+a3=0?

Thanks :smile:
 
capricornpeer said:
Answer given in the book : a1 = 560/51, a2 = 590/51, a3 = 530/51 , T = 560/51 (all in SI units)
These accelerations are greater than g. They cannot be correct.
 
capricornpeer said:
I have chosen the uppermost pulley as reference for displacements x1,x2 and x3. Now, the vector x1's tail is at this pulley and it points towards block 1. Therefore, the direction of a1 is horizontal and pointing towards block 1. Also, since the block 1 will move towards right, a1 will be negative and thus a2 and a3 should be positive. Thus, sum of accelerations can be zero.

Please can you find the constraint relation between accelerations and check if it is indeed
a1+a2+a3=0?

Block 1 accelerates on the right. You can call the acceleration of block 1 by -a1, but a1 is not its acceleration then.
You need to use one coordinate system for a system of masses. Block1 is on the other side of the upper pulley than the other two blocks, so x1 equals to the negative of the distance from the pulley. The acceleration is not the second derivative of distance from the origin, but the second derivative of the position vector.

By the way, Doc Al is right, the given accelerations can not be true.

ehild
 
Last edited:
These accelerations are greater than g. They cannot be correct.
Glad you pointed that out sir. Thanks:smile:

Block 1 accelerates on the right. You can call the acceleration of block 1 by -a1, but a1 is not its acceleration then.
Actually, I took the acceleration of block 1 as a1 and wrote the following equations (the same as my first post) :
1) a1+a2+a3=0
2) for block 1 : T = (-)*(a1) (notice the minus sign)
3) for block 2 : 2*g - T = 2*a2
4) for block 3 : 3*g - T = 3*a3
Ans : a1=-1.09, a2=0.45, a3=0.64

If I take it as -a1, equations are :
1) -a1+a2+a3=0
2) for block 1 : T = (-)*(-a1) = a1
3) for block 2 : 2*g - T = 2*a2
4) for block 3 : 3*g - T = 3*a3
Ans : a1=1.09, a2=0.45, a3=0.64

Evidently, acceleration of block 1 can be taken as a1 and the negative sign in the answer indicates that the acceleration is in the direction opposite to that taken. The important thing to be kept in mind for both cases is: for block 1, T= -a1(in case 1) and T= -(-a1) (in case 2) as acceleration is known to be in the opposite direction from that assumed. Thanks anyways for replying.:smile:
 
Do not forget Newton's second law: F=ma. The force is T, and it points on the right. So the acceleration of block 1 also points on the right. If you write T=-a1*m1, then a1 is not the acceleration of block 1. It is something else: Second derivative of the length of the piece of rope. If you keep saying that a1 is the acceleration and write ma1=-F it is against Physics.

ehild
 

Similar threads

Back
Top