Learn About Credit/No Credit Grading: Benefits & Transfers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jurrasic
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Credit/no credit grading options, also known as pass/no pass, are utilized by students at two-year colleges for various reasons. This grading system allows students to take courses without the pressure of affecting their GPA, making it ideal for those uncertain about their performance in a subject or seeking a more relaxed academic experience. These courses typically do not count towards a student's GPA and cannot be used for major requirements or transferred to four-year colleges. Admissions committees at four-year institutions generally view a limited number of credit/no credit courses favorably, especially if the student maintains a strong GPA overall. This approach demonstrates a strategic choice in course selection, indicating that the student understands when to take risks and when to prioritize their efforts. Many four-year colleges, including prestigious institutions like MIT, offer similar options to help students manage academic pressures, particularly in their first year. Overall, credit/no credit courses can serve as a valuable tool for students navigating their educational paths.
Jurrasic
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
At 2 year colleges, there is this thing called credit / no credit grading option, does anyone know what some reasons are as to why someone would take a class for credit / no credit ? What purpose does this serve? (At some school's it's also called pass / no pass ?)
They appear on a transcript as credit or no credit depending on the effort put into it.
And, how do these look on a students transcript, for transferring to a 4 year college? As far as whether they look good or bad by those reviewing an application for admission into 4 year colleges?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jurrasic said:
At 2 year colleges, there is this thing called credit / no credit grading option, does anyone know what some reasons are as to why someone would take a class for credit / no credit ? What purpose does this serve? (At some school's it's also called pass / no pass ?)
They appear on a transcript as credit or no credit depending on the effort put into it.
And, how do these look on a students transcript, for transferring to a 4 year college? As far as whether they look good or bad by those reviewing an application for admission into 4 year colleges?

They do not get calculated in your GPA. So if you want to take some class, but you are not sure that you want or can put the effort to get a good mark they are a nice option.The thing is that you are can't take courses required for your major and you can't transfer them. As for how they are seen by admissions i think if you don't take to many,pass them and your GPA is good they would think that you know what you are doing and when not to take unnecessary ricks
 
Medschool in Norway is like that. All of it.
 
Even at 4-year colleges - at least, at every one I know of - they have a similar option. (I didn't realize it until my second year of college, though... oops :smile:)
 
diazona said:
Even at 4-year colleges - at least, at every one I know of - they have a similar option.
MIT's freshman year works the same way, so even the good schools do it. The MIT rational is so that their freshies don't die under the pressure of trying to get As in everything the first year.
 
Pass/Fail courses can be a good idea if:
a) Subject is not in your intended major,
b) Subject is difficult [for you] to perform very well in,
c) You're looking for a relaxed/flexible option.

It can be very stressing trying to pick up all the points for an A in some classes (especially if it's a subject where you're prone to small errors which accumulate), but knowing you only need to have a 70+ to pass allows you to prioritize, spend more time on other classes, and generally be more flexible. Like I said, so long as these classes aren't in your major, I doubt anyone looks down on them (I know here at Cornell there's a limit to how many you can take anyways).
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Back
Top