Learning without being spoon fed? (mod, move please?)

  • Thread starter Thread starter khkwang
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the desire to learn physics in a more self-directed manner, rather than through traditional, structured teaching methods that feel overly prescriptive. Participants express frustration with the conventional approach, which often emphasizes memorization of established concepts without encouraging independent thought or exploration. Suggestions for alternative learning methods include seeking out challenging textbooks and utilizing university library resources for access to historical papers. However, caution is advised regarding the complexity and outdated language of these papers. The conversation highlights the importance of balancing foundational knowledge with opportunities for creativity and innovation in physics education.
khkwang
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Learning without being spoon fed?

edit: thanks mods

---------------------------------

Is there a source, or does anyone have an idea how I can learn Physics without being spoon fed? I feel like whenever we were taught something new in my college Physics, we weren't given a chance to come to our own conclusions.

It's usually "blank noticed blank and thus deduced that blank and blank..." and then we're given questions on how this new "tool" can be applied. I've noticed that I've already forgotten much of the subject. But I've been taking lab courses and found that I re-learned a lot of material and even understood better because I somewhat figured it out by myself.

I do get why it's taught this way in class, professors have only so much time to teach so many students, but even the textbooks are the same way! Isn't being a physicist about creativity and innovation? At least give us a short moment to guess something.

Anyway back to the question... does anyone know of a source to (re)-learn some intro. physics (mainly quantum mech, electrodynamics, introductory particle physics, chaos theory) in a less spoon fed way? (looking for textbooks, websites, etc.)

And I've always wondered if normal people had access to historical papers? The ones that the textbooks always refer to when describing something's discovery? I'm guessing I'd have to go through my school's library right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


khkwang said:
And I've always wondered if normal people had access to historical papers? The ones that the textbooks always refer to when describing something's discovery? I'm guessing I'd have to go through my school's library right?

It's not too bad to find these online in pdf format... you should have access through your university library's online journal subscriptions (a lot of these journals go way back.. and online subscriptions generally give you access to the full archives).

I'd be careful about using these for learning however. The language adn vocabulary are sometimes strange -- due to the language standards of the era and some issues about the fact that the phenomena are first being observed (and vocabulary isn't therefore established). Also, sometimes the authors sill don't have things down completely themselves (ex. Maxwell originally had 8 equations, not 4).
 
Because of the laws in some countries people only have free access to historical papers if they are old enough. Sadly the mercenary nature of some people means you can't obtain them either. Thank God for the interweb.

I think you need to start by being spoon fed and then when you are well qualified enough you need to start spoon feeding others new ideas. If you ever lack ideas then physics or any science is probably only for you up to the graduate stage. Which for some is quite enough.

I'm afraid there is no good way to learn anything but your own. Although decent teaching helps. :smile:
 
Calrid said:
Because of the laws in some countries people only have free access to historical papers if they are old enough.
Huh, care to elaborate on that a bit?
 
I think he means "if the papers are old enough" not "if the people are old enough."
 
Ouch, what the hell did I do to misinterpret that in such a way :redface: Nevermind the question then :smile:
 


khkwang said:
I do get why it's taught this way in class, professors have only so much time to teach so many students, but even the textbooks are the same way! Isn't being a physicist about creativity and innovation? At least give us a short moment to guess something.

The material is presented in a highly refined manner so that you can absorb it and move as quickly as possible to the point where you can do your own research. But really, it's only spoon-feeding if you make it so. You could read a good textbook before coming to class, and when you read a good textbook you can try to derive everything on your own.
 
Purchase a challenging textbook and work through it. Then, when you have questions, come to PF and post them in the homework section. :smile:
 
physics girl phd said:
It's not too bad to find these online in pdf format... you should have access through your university library's online journal subscriptions (a lot of these journals go way back.. and online subscriptions generally give you access to the full archives).

I'd be careful about using these for learning however. The language adn vocabulary are sometimes strange -- due to the language standards of the era and some issues about the fact that the phenomena are first being observed (and vocabulary isn't therefore established). Also, sometimes the authors sill don't have things down completely themselves (ex. Maxwell originally had 8 equations, not 4).

Thanks! It's good to know I can find them if I need to. Aside from the unfamiliar vocabulary though, I really wouldn't mind the uncertainties the authors had. It'd be nice to see how they eventually worked things out.

Dembadon said:
Purchase a challenging textbook and work through it. Then, when you have questions, come to PF and post them in the homework section. :smile:

Any suggestions for text in particular?
 
  • #10
jtbell said:
I think he means "if the papers are old enough" not "if the people are old enough."

I meant if they are long enough after someone died yes.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
384
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top