Lebesgue Inequality: Prove from Definition

  • Thread starter Thread starter henry22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
henry22
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show from definition that if f is measurable on [a,b], with m<=f(x)<=M for all x then its lebesgue integral, I, satisfies

m(b-a)<=I<=M(b-a)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the definition is that f:[a,b]->R is measurable if for each t in R the set {x in [a,b] :f(x)>c} is measurable.

But I don't see how this helps?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do I need to use a summation somewhere?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top