Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

LED, solar panel & mirror?

  1. Aug 21, 2010 #1
    The idea's setup is this:

    There is a LED with solar panel and a battery, from one of the sun-charged nightlights, and an optic fiber (the "mirror") that routes the light from the LED onto it's own solar panel.

    The effect is that the light dims about half way down.

    Question: What exactly happens in there?
    -Does the LED gets continuously dimmer (and why)?
    -Or, does it start to blink on and off very fast thus appearing dimmed (and why, what kind of wave would it be)?
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 22, 2010 #2
    Assuming the sun had gone down and the device's only source of power was the LED, I would think that it would gradually lose energy. Some of the radiant energy would become thermal(however small an amount) and it would eventually go out. Now, running on a full charge from the sun and then partially replenishing itself at the same time, it would probably last a very long time, certainly long enough to last until the sun came back(I would think, since the nightlight alone can do that), but it wouldn't last forever.

    Could be worth giving it a try though, that would be an extremely useful emergency flashlight if you also rigged up a bright LED that wasn't feeding into the solar panel. It would drain faster, sure, but in an emergency I don't think you'd really care.
  4. Aug 22, 2010 #3
    Sounds about right. I bet it would work better if you had a transparent solar panel. That could be quite useful.
  5. Aug 22, 2010 #4
    I know there are windows which act as solar panels, but they're made in a different way than traditional silicon-cell solar panels, and they're much less efficient.
  6. Aug 22, 2010 #5
    I guess that would be the trade off. It could be used to illuminate a room, if you had the panel directly opposite the light, and had the rest open.
  7. Dec 18, 2010 #6
    my understanding is that solar panels are extremely inefficient... something on the order of 10 or 20%. Likely where most of the energy loss is occurring. It's been a while since I seriously looked into the technology, though, so I could be wrong.
  8. Dec 18, 2010 #7
    Well, the biggest problem I see is the power transfer from the LED to the solar panel. ASSUMING the LED is low wattage (50mW) AND has a high efficiency light to power ratio (90%), AND that the light frequency output from the LED is a perfect match for the Solar Panel, AND that the solar panel is super efficient (30%), the MAXIMUM power from LED to solar panel output would be:
    50mW * 0.90 * 0.30 = .0135mW. Adding the battery would actually make things worse. Without going into the vagaries of device latencies, I would guess the "lifetime" of this cycle would be in the nanosecond time domain, perhaps less.

  9. Dec 19, 2010 #8
    The most important effect is likely to be partial shutting down of the LED by a circuit which senses when the solar cell is being illuminated. If this uses snap action (hysteresis) switching, one would expect to see cyclic switching on and off, at a rate depending on the response time of the circuit used.

    There is probably very little regeneration of the battery charge going on here, because of the modest efficiencies of the solar cell and the LED. That said, since the LED is probably not running at full power all the time, the average current consumption may well be reduced.
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2010
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook