Left-over AC voltage in a half-wave rectifier

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a formula for calculating the leftover AC voltage in a half-wave rectifier, specifically V_{out(AC)} ≈ (0.385)(V_m - V_{th}). Participants clarify that V_m refers to the secondary peak voltage, not the primary, and that V_{th} is the diode's threshold voltage. The formula's derivation is speculated to involve Fourier series analysis of the rectified signal. The professor confirmed the relationship of the formula to the secondary peak voltage during a class discussion. Overall, the forum provided valuable insights that clarified the confusion surrounding the formula's application.
JJBladester
Gold Member
Messages
281
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



My professor gave us a formula for the left-over output AC voltage in a half-wave rectifier. This formula was given without any calculus or explanation as to how it was obtained.

Homework Equations



V_{out(AC)}\simeq (0.385)(V_m-V_{th})


The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know if Vm is the peak input voltage or the peak secondary voltage (see image below). I do know that Vth is the threshold voltage of a diode; 0.7V for Silicon and 0.3V for Germanium.

half-wave-rectifier.JPG


Does anybody know how this formula was obtained? I don't have any information in my textbook on it and I've read the chapters twice.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Vm is most likely the secondary voltage that's being rectified. If I had to guess, I'd suggest that the formula would come from some tinkering with the Fourier series of the rectified signal. One can pull out the DC component and the various AC harmonics...
 
Thank you gneill. Next time I see the professor I'll ask him about this.
 
FYI, curiosity overcame me this morning so I took the Fourier series of an ideal half-rectified sinewave and extracted the total RMS AC component of the signal. I found an exact expression for the constant:

##\frac{\sqrt{\pi^2 - 4}}{2 \pi} ≈ 0.385589...##
 
So if a transformer were to be involved, this RMS AC voltage would be based on the *secondary* peak voltage, not the primary peak voltage, right?

My professor didn't say whether the AC was peak or RMS but you have clarified that. Thank you. I'm going to have a discussion about the lack of specificity in this class.
 
JJBladester said:
So if a transformer were to be involved, this RMS AC voltage would be based on the *secondary* peak voltage, not the primary peak voltage, right?
Yes, it has to be the secondary peak voltage since the formula subtracts the diode drop which occurs in the secondary circuit.
My professor didn't say whether the AC was peak or RMS but you have clarified that. Thank you. I'm going to have a discussion about the lack of specificity in this class.
Good luck with that :smile: :smile: :smile:
 
Back from class. The teacher let me grab the chalk and draw a tranformer hooked up to a rectifier circuit. I explained my confusion and he confirmed that his formula relates to the secondary peak voltage. I've gotten more help from Physics Forums than my expensive college courses. Thanks yet again.
 
Back
Top