Left, Right or Double headed arrow?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Meganrose
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Understanding when to use left, right, or double-headed arrows in acid-base equilibrium relies on recognizing the strength of acids and bases involved. Strong acids and bases typically indicate reactions that go to completion, represented by one-headed arrows pointing towards the products. However, double-headed arrows can be used for most reactions, as they can proceed in both directions. There is often ambiguity in the choice of arrow type, leading to differing opinions among chemists. Ultimately, the focus should be on the reaction context rather than the specific arrow notation.
Meganrose
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How do you know when to use Left, Right or Double headed arrows for Acid-Base equilibrium?

Homework Equations



How can you determine from a reaction if it "goes to completion" (right) or doesn't react at all (left) or is at equilibrium just by looking at it?

The Attempt at a Solution



This is just a general question. =)

Thanks!
-Megan Rose
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to know which acids and bases are strong and which are weak. Most reactions involving strong acids/bases go to completion so you can use one headed arrows pointing in teh direction where water is one of the products.

But:

1. to some extent you can always use double headed arrow, as almost every possible reaction goes in both directions.

2. there will be always a grey area where every second chemist will have a different opinin on th earrow type that shoukd be used.

Bottom line is: don't put too much attention to the arrow shape :wink:
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top