Length contraction and general relativity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Length contraction in general relativity (GR) is not an absolute phenomenon; it depends on the observer's reference frame and the gravitational field's influence. Objects do not universally get longer or shorter; instead, their perceived size varies based on relative motion and gravitational potential. When comparing lengths, one must consider both motion and gravity, as well as the chosen coordinates for measurement. This understanding is crucial for accurately interpreting length comparisons in both special relativity and general relativity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity concepts
  • Familiarity with reference frames in physics
  • Knowledge of gravitational potential and its effects
  • Basic principles of special relativity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the effects of gravitational time dilation in general relativity
  • Learn about the role of spacetime coordinates in length measurements
  • Explore the implications of length contraction in high-speed scenarios
  • Investigate the relationship between motion and gravitational fields in relativity
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, researchers in theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the implications of general relativity on physical measurements and observations.

johann1301
Messages
216
Reaction score
1
Can one detect length contraction due to general relativity? I.e does length/width/height change with distance to a gravitational centre? If so does the object get longer or shorter?

I know this is the case with increasing speed in special relativity, but what about GR...

If i went into space, would my physical body be subject to any kind of of change in size?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first thing to get about either special or general relativity is that there is no such thing as the absolute size of objects, there isn't even absolute comparisons between the sizes of two things that are in relative motion (in special relativity), or in relative motion in two different places in a gravitational field (in general relativity). Thus one should not talk about things "getting longer or shorter" in some kind of definite, widely-agreed-on, "invariant" way. You see language like that a lot, but it's quite confused. Instead, relativity is about recognizing that if you compare the length of two objects, the answer you get depends on how you do the comparison, which is often called your "reference frame". Loosely, this means how you are moving relative to the objects (in special relativity), or where you are in a gravitational field relative to the objects (in general relativity).

Often, the two objects you will care about are a ruler that is in your hand, and some other ruler that is somewhere else or moving some other way. Then if you adopt standard conventions about how to make length comparisions (which means, more technically, choosing a standard way to coordinatize the spacetime, which in general means making a choice of a grid of observers whose rulers and clocks you will use to talk about the places and times where events occur), you will find that both in special relativity and in general relativity, you will reckon the other ruler to be shorter (if it is moving relative to you or at a higher gravitational potential), or longer (if it is lower in a gravitational potential than you are), relative to the ruler in your hand.

So I think your answer is, in general you must combine the effects of motion and the effects of gravity, and you must choose coordinates, to decide how a length comparison will turn out. The answer you get depends on your choice of coordinates unless you restrict to questions that deal strictly in the "invariants" (and length is not one of those, that was one of the big surprises of relativity).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
7K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
6K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 166 ·
6
Replies
166
Views
15K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K