Length contraction and the expansion of the universe.

mrspeedybob
Messages
869
Reaction score
65
Start with the following 3 statements...

1. If I were traveling through the cosmos at high velocity relative to the CMB I should observe the distances between stars and galaxies to be length contracted in the direction of my motion, but not in directions perpendicular to my travel.

2. The same laws of physics apply in all non-accelerating frames of reference

3. The universe, on large scales, in homogeneous (cosmological principal)

How can all 3 of these statements be true? Any 2 are compatible, but I can't see how all 3 can be true at the same time?


Secondly, I understand there is a limit to the size of our observable universe caused by the expansion of space. Objects further away are causally disconnected from us because they are receding from us at superluminal velocity. If I am traveling at high relativistic speed would I measure a different Hubble constant in my direction of travel then I would perpendicular to my direction of travel, essentially flattening my observable universe into a squished sphere? Or, would my universe still be spherical and regions which would otherwise be causally disconnected become connected due to my velocity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames, but the objects you see may appear different. The big bang cosmology we live in defines a unique rest frame at each point, namely the frame in which the cosmic microwave background is the same in all directions. An observer moving with respect to this frame will see the background redshifted in one direction and blueshifted in the other. When we say the universe is homogeneous, we mean it is homogeneous on a slice of constant time in this rest frame. Since it is expanding, it is obviously not homogeneous in time. Nor is it homogeneous in any other rest frame.
 
mrspeedybob said:
Secondly, I understand there is a limit to the size of our observable universe caused by the expansion of space. Objects further away are causally disconnected from us because they are receding from us at superluminal velocity. If I am traveling at high relativistic speed would I measure a different Hubble constant in my direction of travel then I would perpendicular to my direction of travel, essentially flattening my observable universe into a squished sphere? Or, would my universe still be spherical and regions which would otherwise be causally disconnected become connected due to my velocity?

The causal structure of spacetime (which events are causally connected or disconnected to which other events) is invariant; it does not depend on your state of motion. The universe would *appear* to you to be squashed if you were traveling at high relativistic speed relative to the CMBR, but that would not change which parts of the universe could send signals to you and which could not. (The signals might appear redshifted or blueshifted relative to what they would look like if you were at rest relative to the CMBR.)
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top