Length Contraction & Molecular Structure Effects

Quan Chi
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Just one quick question. What happens to the molecular structure of an object if it moves close to the speed of light? Does the high speed affect the atoms, protons, neutrons, electrons, molecular structures? Does the density/thickness of the object increase? Or do the protons and electrons contract as well?

Also, if the mass increases because of the high speed, how does it affect the molecular structure? How can it have bigger mass then? Does it have more atoms and molecules then?

Regards.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Quan Chi said:
Also, if the mass increases because of the high speed, how does it affect the molecular structure? How can it have bigger mass then? Does it have more atoms and molecules then?
Regards.

You've missed the point of what relativity is telling you. E = mc² says that the mass of an object is a measure of how much energy (both mass-energy AND kinetic energy) it contains.

It is sufficient to increasing the kinetic energy of the molecules composing an object to see its mass increase.
 
Quan Chi said:
What happens to the molecular structure of an object if it moves close to the speed of light?
Nothing. Consider the object to be at rest and the observer moving.
 
Length contraction is a consequence of describing the coordinates of a body in a frame of reference in which it is moving close to light speed. It says nothing about the body itself, except the fact that it is moving very, very fast in that frame. Such a frame can be chosen such that you are moving close to lightspeed, without having to accelerate you to such speeds. In that frame, you will seem to undergo length contraction in the direction you are moving.
 
Consider a frame where you are at rest with your lab equipment and you have accelerated a molecule to some velocity.

More atoms? No, the number of charges is fixed, accelerating the molecule won't change the number of atoms.

More mass? No, mass in the modern terminology means rest mass (or more generally, center of mass energy).

More energy? Yes, the molecule speeds up and so it has more kinetic energy.

Does the shape distort? Yes. The molecule is bound by electromagnetic interactions and these interactions change when you set a molecule in motion (the response of the atoms also changes). All this is captured elegantly in Einstein's length contraction formula (provided you use it correctly). See for instance Bell's discussion in "How to Teach Special Relativtiy" in his book Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics.

In a frame moving along with the molecule, nothing happens to the molecule, but the world around suffers the same effects I mentioned above.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the answers. This has helped.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Back
Top