Length of string on instrument to produce specific frequency

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the position of a fret on a two-string instrument to achieve a specific frequency. The original calculations for the tension and length of the string were incorrect due to misinterpretation of mass per unit length. The correct approach involves using the full mass of the string rather than adjusting it for the new length. After recalculating, the correct distance from the upper end of the string to the fret is determined to be 1.9 cm. This highlights the importance of understanding the properties of the string material in frequency calculations.
idkididk
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You are designing a two-string instrument with metal string 35.0 long, as shown in the figure . Both strings are under the same tension. String has a mass of 8.45 and produces the note middle C (frequency 262 ) in its fundamental mode.

To extend the range of your instrument, you include a fret located just under the strings, but not normally touching them. How far from the upper end should you put this fret so that when you press tightly against it, this string will produce C# (frequency 277 ) in its fundamental?

Homework Equations



f= (1/(2L)) * (F/u)^.5, where f is the frequency, L is length of the string, u is the mass per unit distance, and F is the tension force.

The Attempt at a Solution



So I found that the tension of the string to be 812N. Using that, I solved for x: 277= (1/(2x)) *(812/(.00845/x))^.5

x= .313, which means 31.3 cm. It's asking how far form the upper end, so 35-31.3cm = 3.7cm.

However, this is not correct. Anyone know why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
idkididk said:
So I found that the tension of the string to be 812N.
How did you solve for that? What units are the length and mass given in?

Edit: I see. Length in cm and mass in grams.
 
idkididk said:
So I found that the tension of the string to be 812N. Using that, I solved for x: 277= (1/(2x)) *(812/(.00845/x))^.5
8.45 is the mass of the full string, so don't divide by the new (smaller) length to find μ. (μ is a constant for the string material, regardless of length.)
 
^I just tried that, 277= (1/(2x)) *(812/(.00845/.35))^.5, and got x=33cm, so the answer would be 2, but that's not it either

EDIT: Ok nevermind the answer is 1.9 lol. Thanks!
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top