Length of the life of a red supergiant.

  • Thread starter Thread starter crawleen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Length Life
AI Thread Summary
Red supergiants, like those with a luminosity 400,000 times that of the sun and a mass 30 times greater, have a significantly shorter lifespan compared to the sun. The general life expectancy for a star of this mass is approximately 1 to 2 million years, much less than the sun's 10 billion years. During the red supergiant phase, helium fusion is less efficient than hydrogen fusion, leading to faster fuel consumption. The transition from hydrogen to helium fusion drastically reduces available fuel, further shortening the lifespan. For precise calculations, utilizing computer models is recommended due to the complexities involved in stellar evolution.
crawleen
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
hey,

thought i would throw this problem out there...

if you have the luminosity of a red supergiant 400,000 times more luminous than the sun and a mass of 30 times greater than the sun how would you go about answering how much longer or shorter than the sun would you expect it to liv?

i know luminosity is related to mass but i don't have any actual figures and I am contemplating looking for the circumference /radius and using that.

any smarter thoughts?!?

cheers!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Red supergiants are a phase of the lifecycle of massive stars that they go through after they are no longer main sequence, IE they are no longer burning hydrogen in their core. Before this they are usually blue supergiants, which are typically much smaller than red supergiants in the same way that stars like the Sun are much smaller in their main sequence phase than they are in the red giant phase. Are you wanting to know how long a star with 30 solar masses would live, or how long it would remain in the red supergiant phase?
 
The general rule for life expectancy of a main sequency star is roughly 10 billion divided by its solar mass to the power of 2.5 [1E10/M^2.5]. This formula is less accurate for very small, or large stars. A 30 solar mass star would definitely qualify as very large. The naive life expectancy for such a star would be around 2 million years [but probably closer to 1 million years in reality]. Calculating the life expectancy for the red giant phase is ... complicated. It is safe to say it is less than the main sequence life expectancy because helium fusion is less efficient than hydrogen fusion and the star is far more luminous [using more fuel] than it was during its main sequence phase. The estimate for the sun is around 500 million years, or about 5% of its main sequence life expectancy of 10 billion years. For a 30 solar mass star, we could be talking only a matter of tens of thousands of years before it went boom.
 
Plus the amount of fuel available for a red supergiant is significantly reduced after hydrogen burning. Hydrogen fusion turns 4 hydrogen into 1 helium, so there is only 1/4 the amount of fuel once Helium fusion starts. (Depending on if you view two hydrogen fusing together as 1 reaction or the process of fusing 4 together into helium as one reaction) As further elements are fused the amount of fuel continues to decrease as more nucleons are tied up in larger and larger nuclei.
 
crawleen said:
if you have the luminosity of a red supergiant 400,000 times more luminous than the sun and a mass of 30 times greater than the sun how would you go about answering how much longer or shorter than the sun would you expect it to liv?

You can do some rough guesses based on fusion rates, but if you want a detailed answer, you'll need to dump it all into a computer program.

http://mesa.sourceforge.net/


i know luminosity is related to mass but i don't have any actual figures and I am contemplating looking for the circumference /radius and using that.

There are some scaling relationships for blue supergiants, but when you talk about red ones, those are off the main sequence so it becomes more difficult.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...
Back
Top