MHB This gives us the length of each train as 500 meters.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ilikebugs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Length Trains
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the length of two trains traveling on parallel tracks, one at 40 km/h and the other at 20 km/h. It is established that it takes two minutes longer for the trains to pass each other when moving in the same direction compared to when they are moving in opposite directions. By converting speeds to meters per minute and setting up equations based on the time taken to pass, the length of each train is calculated. The final conclusion reached is that each train measures 500 meters in length. This algebraic approach effectively demonstrates the relationship between speed, time, and distance in this scenario.
Ilikebugs
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
Two trains of equal length are on parallel tracks. One train is traveling at
40 km/h and the other at 20 km/h. It takes two minutes longer for the trains to
completely pass one another when going in the same direction, than when going
in opposite directions.
Determine the length of each train.

Is there a way to algebraically solve this
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would convert the speeds to m/min...

$$v\,\frac{\text{km}}{\text{hr}}\cdot\frac{1\text{ hr}}{60\text{ min}}\cdot\frac{1000\text{ m}}{1\text{ km}}=\frac{50}{3}v\,\frac{\text{m}}{\text{min}}$$

And so the speed of the faster train (in m/min) is:

$$v_F=\frac{2000}{3}$$

And the speed of the slower train is:

$$v_S=\frac{1000}{3}$$

In fact, we could write:

$$v_F=2v_S$$

Let's let the length of the trains be $\ell$.

Now, when the trains pass going in the same direction, we have:

$$(v_F-v_S)(t+2)=2\ell$$

or:

$$v_S(t+2)=2\ell$$

And when the trains pass going in the opposite direction, we have:

$$(v_F+v_S)t=2\ell$$

or:

$$3v_St=2\ell$$

Can you proceed?
 
t=1 so l=500m?
 
Last edited:
We have

$$3v_St=2L\quad(1)$$

and

$$v_S(t+2)=2L\quad(2)$$

Multiply $(2)$ by 3 and then subtract $(1)$ from the result:

$$3v_S(t+2)=6L\Rightarrow3v_St+6v_S=6L$$

$$6v_S=4L\Rightarrow v_S=\frac{2L}{3}\Rightarrow\frac{1000}{3}=\frac{2L}{3}\implies L=500\text{ m.}$$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top