Let E be an algebraic over F, F is perfect. Show that E is perfect

  • Thread starter Thread starter barbiemathgurl
  • Start date Start date
barbiemathgurl
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
let E be an algebraic over F where F is perfect. Show that E is perfect. :rolleyes:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, what have you tried? Our purpose here is to help you work through a problem, not to be an answer book!
 
what doies perfect mean? all algebvraic extensions are separable? sounds trivial from the definitions doesn't it? have you thought about it?

if so, and it still eludes you, think abiout the relation between the irreducible polynomial for a given element over a base field as opposed to over a larger field.
 
Last edited:
@mathwonk: Yes "perfect" means all extensions are seperable.

@barbie: Do the following
1)Let K/E<\infty.
2)Let \alpha \in E
3)Show \mbox{irr} \left< \alpha, E \right> has zeros of multiplicity 1 (Hint: Show that \mbox{irr}\left< \alpha, E \right> | \mbox{irr} \left< \alpha, F \right>*



*)If K algebraic over E algebraic over F then K algebraic over F.
 
Just out of interest: What does the notation irr<a,E> mean?

I though maybe it was a notation for the minimal polynomial of a over E, but as a was in E that doesn't make much sense your 3 wouldn't make much sense.
 
Palindrom said:
Just out of interest: What does the notation irr<a,E> mean?

It is the monic irreducible polynomial such that contains "a" as a zero. This notation is non-standard, but saves space which I have seen in one book.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
442
Replies
0
Views
404
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Back
Top