Let f be entire and |f| >= 1. prove f is constant

  • Thread starter Thread starter DotKite
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant
DotKite
Messages
81
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Let f(z) be entire and let |f(z)| ≥ 1 on the whole complex plane. Prove f is constant.

Homework Equations


Theorem 1: Let f be analytic in the domain D. If |f(z)| = k, where k is a constant, then f is constant.

Maximum Modulus Principle: Let f be analytic and non constant in the bounded domain D. If f is continuous on the closed region R that consists of D and all of its boundary points B, then |f(z)| assumes its max value, and does so only at points on the boundary B.

The Attempt at a Solution



Below is my attempt. Let me know if I am even in the right ballpark.

Proof:

Note that from Theorem 1 if |f(z)| = 1 then f is constant and we are done. Therefore we want to show f is constant for
|f(z)| > 1.

To show this we use contradiction. Suppose f(z) is entire, |f(z)| > 1, and f is non constant. Let D = {z: |z| < 1}. Since f is entire it is continuous on the complex plane. Consequently it is continuous on a region R consisting of D and its boundary points B. By the max modulus principle |f(z)| assumes its max value at the boundary points B. Therefore |f(z)| ≤ 1. Which is contradicts our hypothesis. Therefore f is constant.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DotKite said:
Note that from Theorem 1 if |f(z)| = 1 then f is constant and we are done. Therefore we want to show f is constant for
|f(z)| > 1.
What about an f where |f(z)|=1 somewhere, but not everywhere? You do not cover this case.

By the max modulus principle |f(z)| assumes its max value at the boundary points B.
Okay so far.

Therefore |f(z)| ≤ 1
Why? All you have is |z|<1.

That approach does not work.
 
ok can we consider 1/|f(z)|? which is analytic since we were given f is analytic and |f|≥ 1 on the whole complex plane?

Then 1/|f(z)| ≤ 1 for all z. By liouville's theorem 1/f(z) is constant. Am i warmer?
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top