Let us review about rocket move

  • Thread starter Thread starter gema
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Review Rocket
AI Thread Summary
Rocket motion is explained through Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum, where the rocket moves forward as gas is expelled backward. The discussion highlights that while total energy is conserved in a closed system, mechanical energy is not necessarily conserved due to the conversion of chemical energy into mechanical energy during fuel combustion. The presence of internal forces, such as the reaction of expelling gas, affects the mechanical energy balance. It is clarified that the conservation of energy principle applies, but it encompasses all forms of energy, not just mechanical. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing rocket propulsion dynamics.
gema
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hello Forum,

Let us review about rocket move.The Rocket moving with 2 mechanical principe;Newton's 3 and conservation of momentum.If rocket at t=0 is in rest condition (E=0),after the gas with dm mass go out to the back from rocket ,then rocket move to the front(E=Ek1+Ek2).
Nothing external force in this system,

Energy of system is conserve, if nothing external force in the system.
But why the energy of system isn't conserve?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


gema said:
Energy of system is conserve, if nothing external force in the system.
But why the energy of system isn't conserve?
What do you mean by 'energy is conserved'? Just because there are no external forces, doesn't mean mechanical energy (for example) is conserved. You are converting chemical energy into mechanical energy by burning the fuel. (Total energy is conserved of course.)
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top