Lifting a weight up and bringing it down: work done

AI Thread Summary
Lifting a weight and bringing it back down results in zero displacement, leading to the conclusion that zero work is done according to the basic definition of work as displacement times force. However, the discussion highlights that work is a path function in thermodynamics, suggesting that the work done could be considered non-zero due to the path taken. It is noted that gravity is a conservative force, meaning the net work around a closed path is zero, while non-conservative forces do not follow this rule. The energy expended in raising and lowering a weight may not equate to the work done on the object, especially when considering muscle activity. Overall, the distinction between work done and energy involved is crucial in understanding these dynamics.
crm07149
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
If work is displacement times force, lifting a weight up and bringing it down to the same spot would have zero displacement, and thus zero work is done.

However, isn't work a path function? In thermo we learned that heat and work were path functions while quantities such as internal energy and enthalpy were path functions.

So by thermo reasoning, the work done in the case described above would NOT be zero since work is a path function, but the definition of force as displacement times force says it would be zero.

What am I missing here? Would the same reasoning apply to running around a track, where the person ends at the same spot as they started? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gravity is a conservative force, so the net work around any closed path is 0. The same is not true of non-conservative forces.
 
The energy involved in raising and lowering may not be equal to the work done ON that object. This is particularly relevant when muscles are involved. Work Done 'ON' is not a very relevant factor in many practical instances.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top