Light approaching the event horizon

AI Thread Summary
When observing a black hole from an aircraft that could hypothetically survive, light would not be visible once it crosses the event horizon, as it becomes invisible and cannot escape the gravitational pull. The concept of "seeing" light is tied to photons reaching the observer's eyes, and once light is drawn into the black hole, it cannot reflect off any particles to be detected. Time dilation effects would cause light from objects near the event horizon to appear frozen or distorted to a stationary observer. The discussion also touches on the idea of using glowing particles to visualize the phenomenon, but ultimately, anything that crosses the event horizon becomes undetectable. The complexities of light behavior near a black hole highlight the challenges in understanding such extreme environments.
permapoop
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
What would you see if you were on an aircraft near it that could hypothetically survive?

Would you see light frozen in time, but technically gone? By that I mean would you just see an afterimage of it even though technically it's gone?

Or

Would you see light just vanish into the black hole in an instead due to the gravitational pull of the black hole?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
permapoop said:
What would you see if you were on an aircraft near it that could hypothetically survive?

Would you see light frozen in time, but technically gone? By that I mean would you just see an afterimage of it even though technically it's gone?

Or

Would you see light just vanish into the black hole in an instead due to the gravitational pull of the black hole?

It is confusing to talk about "seeing" particles of light the way we see objects (by having light scatter off of them and reach our eyes.)

You only "see" photons of light when they reach your retina and hit a nerve---IOW are detected.

How about some glow-in-the-dark dust or sand-grains, maybe it glows with blue light because of radioactivity or some chemical in it. Say some glowing sand, giving an eerie blue light?

How about you drop some of that down onto the BH horizon surface?

Would you be willing to change your question to be about that, instead of photons of light?

What would you (outside) see? Maybe you already know the answer?
 
Your question is a bit misleading, are you speaking of a stationary observer nearer to the BH or one in motion(space shuttle). Time dilation would occur and it'd get to a stand still at the EH (Objects) as far as the light approaching us goes well nothing beyond EH would ever appear to us since light itself is pulled towards the dense singularity.

Just a thought.
 
Take a look at Figure 16 on page 25 of

http://www.eftaylor.com/exploringblackholes/Seeing090601v2.pdf .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Any thing that goes into a black hole becomes invisible. Even the black hole itself is invisible. So you wouldn't see any photons or particles once they get pulled into the black hole. Besides particles are only visible after light reflects off them and reaches our eyes. Where would the light that reflects off the particles reach the particles if all of it is sucked into the black hole?
 
George Jones said:
Take a look at Figure 16 on page 25 of

http://www.eftaylor.com/exploringblackholes/Seeing090601v2.pdf .

The E F Taylor draft second edition is wonderful, but that link no longer works. One has to start with the index, now, and hunt:
http://www.eftaylor.com/exploringblackholes/

The closest thing in the current draft, responding to the OP question, is probably current chapter 15
http://www.eftaylor.com/exploringblackholes/SeeingOrbiterRain110513v3.pdf
called "Final Views".

It describes very carefully what the observer sees who is falling into a BH.

The authors choose a large BH and start falling from far away, so that the fall takes several days and there is psychological time to imagine in detail---not just the BH itself but the view of the entire heavens as distorted by the BH gravity and by the fallingspeed aberration.

Amazing book. Second edition of "Exploring BH" (JA Wheeler coauthored first edition). GJ please correct if I have anything wrong here. Anybody else a fan of this book?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top