Light Momentum Confusion: Proving with Math/Eqns

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that light possesses momentum, specifically addressing the equation E2=m2c4+p2c2. Participants clarify that light, having zero rest mass (m=0), cannot be analyzed using traditional momentum equations for massive particles. Instead, the correct approach involves quantum mechanics, where the momentum of photons is defined by the equation p=h/λ, with h being the Planck constant and λ the wavelength. The four-momentum framework is emphasized, indicating that light's momentum cannot be derived from classical mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically photon behavior
  • Familiarity with the Planck constant and wave-particle duality
  • Knowledge of four-momentum concepts in relativity
  • Basic grasp of classical mechanics and momentum equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of photon momentum using p=h/λ
  • Explore the concept of four-momentum in special relativity
  • Investigate the implications of null geodesics in light propagation
  • Review empirical methods in physics for validating theoretical predictions
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the fundamental properties of light and its behavior in relativistic contexts.

Irfan Nafi
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
In E2=m2c4+p2c2
how do you prove light has momentum? I've tried but my answer comes to be undefined. Light has m=0, so you're left with p2c2. p=(mv)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) When substituting values of light you get that p=0/0. How do you prove light has momentum using math and equations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The expression for momentum for photons in QM is ##p=\hbar k##. Where ##k## is the wave number (##k=\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}##) and ##\hbar## is the Planck constant divided by ##2\pi## . Or equivalently, ##p=\frac{h}{\lambda}## . Your equation for ##p## is for massive particles with non zero rest mass.
Edit: Also note that in your expression for p if you put v=c (photon) then you get a division by zero! It is good to check for these stuff when you are doing calculations.
Edit 2: Sorry I thought that this was posted in QM section. Apologies.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Irfan Nafi
In relativity, p is not necessarily obtained by multiplying mass by velocity.

For a photon, instead we work with the four-momentum, the first component ##p^0## of which, in any reference frame, is the energy of the photon in that frame. The other three components ##p^1,p^2,p^3## are momenta in the directions of the three spatial axes of the frame. We want the four-momentum to be a null vector (vector of zero magnitude), because light travels along null geodesics. So that means that not all the other three components of the four momentum can be zero - since the first component (Energy) ##p^0## is nonzero. If we rotate the frame so that the x spatial axis points in the direction of the photon's travel, we know that the other two momentum components ##p^2,p^3## must be zero, and we conclude that ##p^1=p^0## where ##p^0=E=h\nu## is the photon's energy.
 
Irfan Nafi said:
p=(mv)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
This is a relation that only holds fot massive particles. You cannot use it for light.

Irfan Nafi said:
I've tried but my answer comes to be undefined. Light has m=0, so you're left with p2c2
Yes, and so you are done. If light carries energy, then it carries momentum p=E/c.

Irfan Nafi said:
How do you prove light has momentum using math and equations?

You don't. This is not how physics works, it is an empirical science. Your theory makes a prediction and you test it in the lab.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Irfan Nafi
andrewkirk said:
instead we work with the four-momentum
I strongly suspect that this will pass over the head of the OP in a B level thread ...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K