Light Momentum & Photography: Facts & Effects

  • Thread starter Thread starter uzair_ha91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Momentum
uzair_ha91
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
I've read somewhere that only red light is used in photography because of its low energy which does not affect the photographic plate.
So my question is that when light shines on a surface, is momentum transferred to the metal surface?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, any surface that reflects, absorbs or emits light will effectively act as if light imparted a very small pressure on it. Reflection, which can be thought of as an absorption followed by an emission more or less back the same way, gives up to twice the pressure. Light (including heat from black-body radiation) emitted from the "the other side" of the surface will of course reduce the effective pressure.

You can look up how solar sails work to see a "practical" application of this effect.
 
uzair_ha91 said:
I've read somewhere that only red light is used in photography because of its low energy which does not affect the photographic plate.QUOTE]

I hope your not suggesting that film photography cannot photograph something red?
Perhaps the special "red light" used in developing rooms are of such a wavelength that the photographic dyes are not sensitive to.

Thus, I think this has more to do with wavelength sensitivity rather than "energy" levels.

Just my thoughts... could be wrong.
 
Wavelength is inversely proportional to energy, or something like that.

As an extension of the topic "momentum of light", if you shine light on an object in space, will the object start moving?
 
Char. Limit said:
if you shine light on an object in space, will the object start moving?

Solar Sail
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top