Light reflected 90° out of phase, not 180°

  • Thread starter Thread starter damosuz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Phase
AI Thread Summary
Light appears to move slower in glass due to the interaction with electrons, which emit a wave that is 90° out of phase with the incident light wave. This reflection process indicates that the reflected wave is also 90° out of phase, contradicting the common belief that it is 180° out of phase. The discussion references Feynman's lectures and a Wikipedia article for further clarification. The distinction in phase angles challenges traditional analogies used to explain light reflection. This insight prompts a reevaluation of how light behavior is described in various media.
damosuz
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
Classically, we explain why light appears to move slower in glass by saying that the electrons in glass emit a light wave which is 90° out of phase with the light wave shaking them. However, the electrons would have to emit this wave not only in the incident direction, but in the opposite direction as well, which would be the reflected wave. This means the reflected wave is 90° out of phase with the incident wave, and not 180° as it is mentioned everywhere (often by making an analogy with string attached to a rigid wall). What am I missing here?
 
Science news on Phys.org
damosuz said:
the electrons in glass emit a light wave which is 90° out of phase with the light wave shaking them
This is new to me. Can you mention the source?
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top