Light released within a sphere with a perfectly opaque inner surface

AI Thread Summary
A beam of light released within a sphere with a perfectly opaque inner surface will not remain bright indefinitely, as the light will be absorbed by the surface. The discussion highlights that "opaque" does not equate to perfect reflectivity; even a black sheet of paper, while opaque, allows some light to escape. Superconductors can act as near-perfect mirrors, trapping light for short durations, but they still experience heat losses upon reflection. The key distinction is that true opacity means light cannot penetrate, but it can still be absorbed, leading to eventual darkness. Therefore, a truly opaque material would not keep the inner area bright indefinitely.
antwan89
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a question that has been puzzling me. If a beam of light was released within a sphere or cube with a completely opaque inner surface would the inner area remain bright for a prolonged period of time or perhaps indefinitely assuming a vacuum exists within the sphere?

Perhaps a perfectly opaque surface does not exist? Perhaps a mirror made from a superconductor would be a more effective inner surface assuming the mirror isn't already the most opaque surface available, although I understand there heat losses occur when light is reflected off a mirrored surface.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Opaque (=not transparent) is not enough, a black sheet of paper is opaque as well. If the surface is a perfect mirror, then sure, the light would stay in.

Superconductors are extremely close to perfect mirrors - with microwaves, you can "trap" light for ~100 milliseconds with them (source), and the radio-frequency cavities used for particle accelerators achieve similar Q-factors as well.
 
than you mfb, but isn't opaque also defined as "Impenetrable by light; neither transparent nor translucent." A sheet of black paper is translucent is it not? To the human eye it will block out most of the light, but some will escape.

If a truly Opaque material was used, surely no light could escape the sphere and it would remain permanently bright?
 
No. "No light could escape" if the light is absorbed by the surface. "Opaque" does NOT mean "perfectly reflective".
 
antwan89 said:
A sheet of black paper is translucent is it not?
That's not the important point (add multiple layers if you like). A black surface does not reflect light, even if the material behind it does not allow any light to pass.

If a truly Opaque material was used, surely no light could escape the sphere and it would remain permanently bright?
The light can get absorbed.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top