Light speed and gravitational matrix

AI Thread Summary
Light travels at a constant velocity within a medium, while gravity, according to Einstein, displaces the space-time matrix based on mass. Massive objects bend light, leading to a phenomenon known as gravitational lensing. Shapiro's theory indicates a time lag for light as it passes around these massive objects. The discussion raises questions about the viability of a propagation matrix and its relationship to gravity, as well as the nature of time dilation in a vacuum. The complexities of these theories highlight the challenges in understanding the interplay between light, gravity, and the concept of a transmission medium.
daviar
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Light appears to travel at a constant velocity in a constant medium/matrix. According to Einstein, gravity is the opposing force of displaced space/time matrix by mass. The more mass, the more the gravitational displacement.

Light is "bent" around massive objects.

Shapiro? says there is a "time lag" of light passing around massive objects.

Questions:

Why did the propagation of light in a matrix theory die?

Why can't the propagation matrix be the same gravitational matrix?

Why can't the time lag be accounted for by the slowing of light in a denser matrix?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Not sure what this "matrix theory" you are referring to is, but time dilation is often tested in a vacuum, so it is very clearly independent of a transmission medium.
 
russ_watters said:
Not sure what this "matrix theory" you are referring to is, but time dilation is often tested in a vacuum, so it is very clearly independent of a transmission medium.

not at all clear to me as I don't know how you would evacuate gravity
 
Gravity is not a transmission medium. When Russ talks about transmission medium, he's talking about like glass, or water, or air that the light has to pass through.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top