Light Speed: Consequences of Relativistic Speeds

blimkie
Messages
111
Reaction score
0
say your traveling in a spacecraft at relatavistic speeds, about .700c and you shoot a laser out of the spacecraft (3.00 x 10^8 m/s foward). How was does the light travel. If you do the same thing but shoot it out the abck the oppossite way how was does the light travel.

This was a question on my exam this morning
the light out of the front would travel at 3.00 x 10 ^ 8 m/s correct? becuase the speed of light cannot be broken.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
blimkie said:
say your traveling in a spacecraft at relatavistic speeds, about .700c and you shoot a laser out of the spacecraft (3.00 x 10^8 m/s foward). How was does the light travel. If you do the same thing but shoot it out the abck the oppossite way how was does the light travel.

This was a question on my exam this morning
the light out of the front would travel at 3.00 x 10 ^ 8 m/s correct? becuase the speed of light cannot be broken.
Strictly speaking, the question is not well posed since it doesn't say whether the speed is to be taken relative to you or the person with relative to whom you are moving at 0.700c. It really dosn't matter, the light will, of course, travel at c, about 3 x 10^8 m/s, whether it is directed forward or backward, whether relative to you in the spacecraft or relative to the person who sees you moving at 0.700c. If you want to do it the hard way, remember that the formula for adding relativistic speeds is
\frac{u+ v}{1+ \frac{uv}{c^2}}
so that if u= c, the speed is
\frac{v+ c}{1+ \frac{cv}{c^2}}= \frac{v+c}{1+ \frac{v}{c}}= \frac{(v+c)c}{v+c}= c
 
blimkie said:
say your traveling in a spacecraft at relatavistic speeds, about .700c and you shoot a laser out of the spacecraft (3.00 x 10^8 m/s foward). How was does the light travel. If you do the same thing but shoot it out the abck the oppossite way how was does the light travel.

This was a question on my exam this morning
the light out of the front would travel at 3.00 x 10 ^ 8 m/s correct? becuase the speed of light cannot be broken.
Well in my understanding of the matter we always travel at 0c.
The speed of light is always c, we cannot catch up or approach it.

The exam question was worded poorly, if should have said something like travel at 0.700c relative to a particular object in space. You cannot measure speed relative to the speed of light since Einstein's theory proved that the speed of light remains constant.
 
I think the question was probably worded that way on purpose. Only because lightspeed is constant can the question be asked that way.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top