Light, Wavelength, Space, and the color of Stars

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the properties of stars as blackbody radiators, emphasizing that they absorb and reemit energy, which leads to the conclusion that they do not appear perfectly black or white. The reasoning for identifying curves 3 and 4 as having the highest relative brightness of orange is highlighted. A student's experiment with high-speed electrons producing waves suggests that changing electric fields can generate electromagnetic waves, with the consensus leaning towards option A as the correct answer. The conversation also clarifies misconceptions about the nature of electromagnetic waves and their independence from gravitational influence. Overall, the thread explores the relationship between light, wavelength, and the characteristics of stars and waves.
Qube
Gold Member
Messages
461
Reaction score
1
Question 1:

http://i.minus.com/iOmQvqhasiXmx.png

My reasoning is curves 3 and 4. These curves have the biggest relative brightness of orange.

Question 2:

Stars are called blackbody radiators because they

a) never appear perfectly black
b) always appear perfectly white
c) reflect most of the light that falls on them
d) absorb most of the light that falls on them

Blackbody radiators completely absorb and reemit all incident energy. From this definition, c and d MUST be incorrect. A is also incorrect. By process of elimination, I arrive at b.

Question 3:

One student heated a metal wire to produce high speed electrons. When the electrons struck a metal target, waves were produced as shown in the diagram below. What does the student's experiment most likely demonstrate?

http://i.minus.com/iplmhuT7lwedU.png

a) changing electric fields can produce electromagnetic waves

b) the direction of transverse waves is always towards the pull of gravity

c) the direction of electromagnetic waves is always towards the pull of gravity

d) high speed electrons produce longitudinal waves upon striking a metal target

I eliminated both B and C because neither transverse nor electromagnetic waves are affected by gravity. That leaves me with A and D. I know A is correct in itself, but I am not sure if it is a correct response to the question and the diagram. I suspect that the answer is A because when high speed electrons strike a metal target they bounce off and produce X-rays, which are EM waves, and EM waves are by definition transverse waves.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Qube said:
Question 1:
My reasoning is curves 3 and 4. These curves have the biggest relative brightness of orange.


So what's the question?

Qube said:
Question 2:

Stars are called blackbody radiators because they

a) never appear perfectly black
b) always appear perfectly white
c) reflect most of the light that falls on them
d) absorb most of the light that falls on them

Blackbody radiators completely absorb and reemit all incident energy. From this definition, c and d MUST be incorrect. A is also incorrect. By process of elimination, I arrive at b.


Err, so why does d have to be incorrect? Do you think the sun appears perfectly white?


Qube said:
Question 3:

One student heated a metal wire to produce high speed electrons. When the electrons struck a metal target, waves were produced as shown in the diagram below. What does the student's experiment most likely demonstrate?

http://i.minus.com/iplmhuT7lwedU.png

a) changing electric fields can produce electromagnetic waves

b) the direction of transverse waves is always towards the pull of gravity

c) the direction of electromagnetic waves is always towards the pull of gravity

d) high speed electrons produce longitudinal waves upon striking a metal target

I eliminated both B and C because neither transverse nor electromagnetic waves are affected by gravity. That leaves me with A and D. I know A is correct in itself, but I am not sure if it is a correct response to the question and the diagram. I suspect that the answer is A because when high speed electrons strike a metal target they bounce off and produce X-rays, which are EM waves, and EM waves are by definition transverse waves.


Indeed that would seem to make sense since the wave seems to be moving in air, not in the metal slab. If it were in the metal, it could be a sound wave or whatever.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top