Limit of (-1)^n(2n^3)/(n^3+1) using Absolute Value Theorem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the limit of the sequence defined by the expression (-1)^n(2n^3)/(n^3+1). Participants explore the implications of applying the absolute value theorem and the behavior of the sequence as n approaches infinity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants attempt to apply the absolute value theorem, suggesting it yields a limit of 2 as n approaches infinity, while questioning the implications if the theorem fails.
  • Others discuss the significance of the alternating factor (-1)^n and its effect on convergence, raising questions about the nature of the limit in the presence of this term.
  • There are considerations of using epsilon-delta definitions to analyze the limit and the behavior of the sequence.
  • Participants suggest examining specific terms of the sequence to gain insight into its behavior.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored regarding the limit's convergence. Participants are questioning the validity of the absolute value theorem in this context and examining the implications of the alternating term on the limit.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted uncertainty regarding the convergence of the sequence when the absolute value theorem does not hold, and participants express a lack of documentation on the relationship between the theorem's validity and sequence divergence.

Jimbo57
Messages
96
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the limit of this sequence:

(-1)n(2n3)/(n3+1)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



At first glance I would attempt to use the absolute value theorem which gives an answer of 2 as n approaches infinite. My question is, when the theorem fails ( limit =/ 0) then does that mean the sequence is divergent? I haven't seen any documentation that explicitly states an is divergent if the absolute value theorem doesn't hold.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jimbo57 said:

Homework Statement



Find the limit of this sequence:

(-1)n(2n3)/(n3+1)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



At first glance I would attempt to use the absolute value theorem which gives an answer of 2 as n approaches infinite. My question is, when the theorem fails ( limit =/ 0) then does that mean the sequence is divergent? I haven't seen any documentation that explicitly states an is divergent if the absolute value theorem doesn't hold.

By taking the absolute value, you're essentially stripping off the factor of (-1)n, which isn't legitimate to do. If you write down 5 or 6 terms of the sequence, you should get an idea of what it is doing.
 
From an analysis point of view assume that there is some limit L. Then, by definition, for any epsilon there must exist some N such that for all n>N. Take a small epsilon, less than the limit if there was no (-1)^n, and then show that the next term is larger than said epsilon.
 
Jufro said:
From an analysis point of view assume that there is some limit L.
Well, that's problemlematic with this limit!

Then, by definition, for any epsilon there must exist some N such that for all n>N. Take a small epsilon, less than the limit if there was no (-1)^n, and then show that the next term is larger than said epsilon.
What I would do is divide both numerator and denominator by n^3. That gives
(-1)^n\frac{2}{1+ \frac{1}{n^3}}

If it were not for that "(-1)^n" we could immediately say that the limit, as n goes to infinity, is 2. But what does that say about the limit with that "(-1)^n"?
 
The question basically boils down to \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}(-1)^n. Does this limit converge? It was pointed out that with this term removed, the limit converges to the value of 2. This term switches between -1 and +1 every time we increase n. Intuitively what does that mean?
 
Jimbo57 said:
My question is, when the theorem fails ( limit =/ 0) then does that mean the sequence is divergent? I haven't seen any documentation that explicitly states an is divergent if the absolute value theorem doesn't hold.

That's because an arbitrary (a_n) might still converge. If |a_n| \to L > 0 then the three possibilities are that a_n \to L, or a_n \to -L, or (a_n) diverges, having the property that for any \epsilon > 0 there exists N \in \mathbb{N} such that for all n \in \mathbb{N}, if n \geq N then either |a_n - L| < \epsilon or |a_n - (-L)| < \epsilon.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K