Limit of a two variable function

In summary, the conversation discusses verifying the limit of a function as (x,y) approaches (0,0), and explores different methods to solve it. The conversation also mentions using the L'Hopital's rule and the epsilon-delta method to prove the limit. The limit is eventually found to be 0 after separating the function into two parts.
  • #36
See my note
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
Stephen Tashi said:
That's correct, but does that, by itself, prevent the limit from existing? This is very technical question involving how we interpret the definition of the limit. The definition has the form " For each ... there exists...such that...for each ##(x,y)##, ##| f(x,y) - L| < \epsilon##". ##\ ## Are we to understand that the implicit meaning is "for each ##(x,y)## in the domain of ##f##"? ##\ ## Or perhaps that ##| f(x,y) - L | < \epsilon##" is not a false statement when ##(x,y)## is not in the domain of ##f##, but rather an undefined expression?

All very true, but actually orthogonal to the point I was trying to make. What I was trying to get at is that if you are trying to find the limit of a rational function (or something which is effectively a rational function, since [itex]\sin (\theta) ~ \theta[/itex] for small [itex]\theta[/itex]) at the origin, the denominator being zero along some curve running through the origin usually means that you can make the function blow up by following another curve close to the first one. Thus seeing that the function fails to exist along some curve through the origin is usually a good sign that the limit won't exist, independently of the answer to that technical question.

That's a good idea, but does it work? ##\ | sin(\theta) | \le |\theta | ##. ##\ \theta## would be a polynomial of degree 12 in ##y## and the denominator would be a polynomial of degree 4 in ##y##.

Yes. Along the curve x=-y^2 + y^4:

[tex]\lim_{y \to 0^+} \frac{\sin (x^3 + y^3)}{x + y^2} \\
= \lim_{y \to 0^+}\frac{\sin ((-y^2 + y^4)^3 + y^3)}{-y^2 + y^4 + y^2} \\
= \lim_{y \to 0^+}\frac{\sin (y^3 - y^6 + 3y^8 - 3y^{10} + y^{12})}{y^4} \\
= \lim_{y \to 0^+}\frac{y^3 + O(y^6)}{y^4} \\
= \lim_{y \to 0^+}\frac{1 + O(y^3)}{y} \\
= \infty[/tex]

So the original limit does not exist.
 
  • Like
Likes Stephen Tashi and Inventive
  • #38
Citan Uzuki said:
All very true, but actually orthogonal to the point I was trying to make. What I was trying to get at is that if you are trying to find the limit of a rational function (or something which is effectively a rational function, since [itex]\sin (\theta) ~ \theta[/itex] for small [itex]\theta[/itex]) at the origin, the denominator being zero along some curve running through the origin usually means that you can make the function blow up by following another curve close to the first one. Thus seeing that the function fails to exist along some curve through the origin is usually a good sign that the limit won't exist, independently of the answer to that technical question.
Yes. Along the curve x=-y^2 + y^4:

[tex]\lim_{y \to 0^+} \frac{\sin (x^3 + y^3)}{x + y^2} \\
= \lim_{y \to 0^+}\frac{\sin ((-y^2 + y^4)^3 + y^3)}{-y^2 + y^4 + y^2} \\
= \lim_{y \to 0^+}\frac{\sin (y^3 - y^6 + 3y^8 - 3y^{10} + y^{12})}{y^4} \\
= \lim_{y \to 0^+}\frac{y^3 + O(y^6)}{y^4} \\
= \lim_{y \to 0^+}\frac{1 + O(y^3)}{y} \\
= \infty[/tex]

So the original limit does not exist.
Thanks for taking the time to explain it this way. I can visualize what you are saying
 
  • #39
Citan Uzuki said:
Yes. Along the curve x=-y^2 + y^4:

I see what you mean.

We can also use the way more often seen in textbooks - showing that different limits can be had by using different curves if we use curves of the form ##x = -y^2 + ky^3##.

Let ##G(x,y) = \frac{x^3 + y^3}{x + y^2}\ ## Use the path defined by ##x = -y^2 + k y^3## where ##k## is a non-zero constant. This path goes through ##(0,0)##
Along this path, for ##y \ne 0##, ##G(x,y) = g(y) = \frac{ (-y^2 + ky^3)^3 + y^3}{ky^3} = \frac{(y^6 + 3ky^7 - 3k^2 y^8 + k^3 y^9 ) + y^3}{ky^3} = \frac{y^3+ 3ky^4 - 3k^2y^5 + y^6 + 1}{k} ##
So ##lim_{y \rightarrow 0} g(y) = \frac{1}{k}##.
Since ##\sin()## is a continuous function ##lim_{y \rightarrow 0} \sin(g(y)) = \sin( \frac{1}{k})##.
This shows ##lim_{(x,y) \rightarrow (0,0)} sin(G(x,y)) ## does not exist since we have can get different limits on different paths depending on our choice for ##k##.
 
  • #40
Thank you Stephen for the further information
 
  • #41

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
387
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
333
Replies
4
Views
352
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
292
Replies
1
Views
206
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Back
Top