Limit of multivariable function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The limit of the multivariable function lim(x,y)->(4,pi)(x^2sin(x/y)) was analyzed using both polar coordinates and the epsilon-delta method. The polar coordinate approach concluded that the limit does not exist due to its dependence on the angle alpha. Conversely, the epsilon-delta method demonstrated that the limit exists and is equal to (16/(2)^(1/2)) by translating the coordinate system to center around (4, pi). This analysis confirms the importance of the coordinate system in evaluating limits in multivariable calculus.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of multivariable calculus concepts, specifically limits.
  • Familiarity with polar coordinates and their application in limit evaluation.
  • Knowledge of the epsilon-delta definition of limits.
  • Ability to manipulate trigonometric functions in calculus contexts.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of limits in multivariable calculus.
  • Learn about polar coordinates and their applications in evaluating limits.
  • Explore the implications of coordinate transformations in limit evaluations.
  • Investigate common pitfalls in limit calculations for multivariable functions.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in multivariable calculus, mathematicians analyzing limits, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of limit evaluation techniques in higher mathematics.

alok24590
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


lim(x,y)->(4,pi)(x^2sin(x/y)), i tried it by polar as well as epsilon delta method, but by polar coordinate method it is coming that " limit doesn't exits" but by epsilon delta method "it exists & is equal to (epsilon+(16/(2)^(1/2)) )^(1/2)-4.



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


replacing x by rcos(alpha)& y by rsin(alpha) i get lim(r)->((16+pi^2)^(1/2))(rcos(alpha))^(2).sin(cot(alpha)) & since it depends upon alpha hence limit of it doesn't exists. but by epsilon delya method
let limit is equal to 16/(2)^(1/2)
the limit can be replaced as lim(z,k)->(0,0)((z+4)^(2)sin((z+4)/(k+pi)))
take any epsilon>0
to show that there exists a delta>0 such that !(z,k)!<delta
it empiles !f(z,k)-(16/(2)^(1/2))!<epsilon
now replacing z by rcos(alpha)& k by rsin(alpha)we get
!(rcos(alpha)+4)^(2).sin((rcos(alpha)+4)/(kcos(alpha)+pi))-(16/(2)^(1/2))!
that is indeed <(r+4)^(2)-(16/(2)^(1/2))
replacing r by delta we get we get the answer that i told earlier...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The limit is at (4, pi) so r alone does NOT measure the distance of (x,y) to (4, pi). That method only works if the limit is at (0,0) so that r does measure that distance, regardless of theta. What you did in your second method was to "translate" the coordinate system so that (0,0) in (z, k) is (4, pi) in (x,y). Now that method works.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K