LIMITS, continuity piece defined function

susan__t
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
The question asks to find a value for a and b that makes f continuous everywhere.

f(x)=
\frac{x - 4}{x-2} , where x<2

ax2 - bx + 3 , where 2<x<3

2x - a +b , where x > or = 3


I know that in order for a function to be continuous the limit as x approaches 2 must be equal from the left and right and f(2) must be defined. I don't know how I can possibly make it continuous if x never is equal to 2, then f(x) would not be possible and it would be a removable discontinuity.
There's no answer available at the back of my text or in the solutions manual so it seems a bit fishy to me
Any help solving this would be great (if there even is a solution)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In order for a function to be continuous as a point p, the function must be defined at f(p) and the limit of f(x) as x approaches p must be equal to f(p).

In order for this function we are considering here to be continuous, one of the conditions is that it must be continuous at x = 2. Also notice that when x approaches 2, the function increases beyond all positive bounds. This should help you out.
 
Last edited:
Most likely they meant make f continuous everywhere on its domain, as x=2 is not part of its domain. Then your only concern is to make sure the line and the quadratic meet at their endpoints.
 
One more point and one question. The function is

<br /> f(x) = \begin{cases}<br /> \frac{x-4}{x-2} &amp; \text{ if } x &lt; 2\\<br /> ax^2 - bx + 3 &amp; \text{ if } 2 &lt; x &lt; 3\\<br /> 2x-a + b &amp; \text{ if } x \ge 3<br /> \end{cases}<br />

As slider142 mentioned, part of the work is going to involve making sure that the quadratic and the linear portions agree when you look at the limits at x = 3. However, this is only one condition, and you have two unknown constants, a, b. The other condition will involve the right-hand limit of the quadratic at x = 2, so you will
need to decide on how

<br /> \lim_{x \to 2^+} f(x)<br />

should bd defined, and this will give you the second condition on a, b.


Now for my question: Is the end of the linear portion -a + b or is it -(a+b)? It doesn't make any difference for us, but it can for your answer.
 
Are you sure you have copied the problem correctly? There is NO way to make the function given continuous at x= 2 because its limit, as x approaches 2 from below, does not exist.

If, however, the function were defined as (x2- 4)/(x- 2) for x less than 2, then it would be possible.

If, in fact, the problem is to find a and b such that
f(x) = \begin{cases}\frac{x^2-4}{x-2} &amp; \text{ if } x &lt; 2\\ax^2 - bx + 3 &amp; \text{ if } 2 &lt; x &lt; 3\\2x-a + b &amp; \text{ if } x \ge 3\end{cases}
then, because, for x not equal to 2, (x2- 4)/(x-2)= (x-2)(x+2)/(x-2), which, for x not equal to 2, is just x+ 2 and has limit 4, from below, at x= 2.

Now, you want to find a and b such that the limit of ax2- bx+ 3, as x approaches 2 from above, is 4. That's easy because that is a polynomial and so its limit is 4a- 2b+ 3. You must have 4a- 2b+ 3= 4.

As x approaches 3, from below, you have 9a- 3b+ 3 and, from above, again because 2x- a+ b is a polynomial, the limit is 6-a+ b.

Assuming that the problem really had (x2-4)/(x-2) rather than(x-4)/(x-2), you must solve the two equations 4a- 2b+ 3= 4 and 9a- 3b+ 3= 6- a+ b for a and b.

If the problem really is what you say, then there is no solution!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top