Limits of integration for electric potential

5 replies · 2K views · last reply
Calpalned
Messages
297
Reaction score
6
In the example in the picture, we can see that they chose the limits of integration to be from 0 to R_0. Why didn't they choose x (that is, from 0 to x)? Isn't that what we normally integrate over when we find potential energy and electric fields?
Thank you
Textbook page, Example 23-9, showing the derivation of the potential at an axial point due to a uniformly charged disk, with the integral of dq over the disk and the result V = Q/(2 pi epsilon0 R0) times (sqrt(x^2 + R0^2) minus x), plus a note for x much greater than R0, and Figure 23-15 showing a disk with a point P on its axis.
 
Here we are adding potential at P due to different ring elements. The disk is considered as large numbers of thin rings with radii varying from 0 to R0 hence the potential due to a ring element is integrated for radius 0 to R0.
 
That makes sense... so integrating from 0 to x would be invalid?
 
Yes, actually integration is the sum and we are here adding nothing which is varying with x. The distance x of P is a constant.
 
mukundpa said:
Yes, actually integration is the sum and we are here adding nothing which is varying with x. The distance x of P is a constant.
Ok thank you. I understand now