Limits of Partial Charges in Dipoles

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, the focus is on the nature of partial charges in dipoles, particularly in the context of double and triple bonds. It is emphasized that partial charges are always less than the unit electronic charge (1.6×10−19 C), which raises the question of whether electronegative atoms can pull shared electron clouds to create charges exceeding this limit. The consensus is that this is not possible because anions, despite their electronegativity, cannot exert enough influence to surpass the unit charge. The concept of zwitterions is mentioned, likely to illustrate the behavior of charged species, but the primary argument centers on the limitations of charge distribution in covalent bonding scenarios.
tbn032
Messages
34
Reaction score
7
In my book it is written "Ends of dipole possesses partial charges. Partial charges are always less than the unit electronic charge (1.6×10−19 C)".
Suppose in a double bond(two electron is shared by each atom) or triple bond(three electrons are shared by each atom), can the electronegative atom pull the shared electron cloud to the extent that the charges at the end of the dipole exceed 1.6×10−19 C.why is that not possible? Is it because the anions are not electronegative to that extent, hence they cannot pull the electron cloud to the extent that the charges at the end of the dipole exceed 1.6×10−19 C?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top