Line charge inside a conducting sphere?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the problem of determining the electromagnetic field associated with a line charge located inside a spherical conducting shell. Participants explore the mathematical framework, specifically the use of Green's functions, boundary conditions, and image charges, while addressing the implications of the problem's constraints.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose solving for the Green's function of the spherical conducting shell to derive the electromagnetic field inside and outside the shell.
  • One participant emphasizes that the problem requires finding the locus of the line charge rather than the field itself, suggesting an approach involving image charges.
  • Another participant suggests that if only the locus is needed, specifying the endpoints of the line charge might suffice, although they express uncertainty about uniformity.
  • There is a proposal to calculate the image charge distribution for a point charge and extend this to a line charge density, leading to a net force calculation involving the original and mirror charge distributions.
  • One participant questions whether another participant can follow the complex reasoning presented in the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing interpretations of the problem's requirements, particularly regarding whether to focus on the electromagnetic field or the locus of the line charge. There is no consensus on the best approach to take, and multiple competing views remain.

Contextual Notes

Participants rely on specific boundary conditions and mathematical formulations, which may not be universally agreed upon. The discussion includes assumptions about the grounding of the shell and the nature of the charge distribution, which are not fully resolved.

ebru
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
1571232236063.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Solve for the Green's function of the spherical conducting shell (it can only be a shell, because otherwise there cannot be any non-vanishing charge distribution inside in the static case) and then do the integral to get the em. field inside and outside the shell.
 
vanhees71 said:
Solve for the Green's function of the spherical conducting shell (it can only be a shell, because otherwise there cannot be any non-vanishing charge distribution inside in the static case) and then do the integral to get the em. field inside and outside the shell.
I don't know how to do that.
 
The Green function ##D(\vec{x},\vec{x}')## is the solution of
$$\Delta D(\vec{x},\vec{x}')=-\delta^{(3)}(\vec{x}-\vec{x}').$$
It's the solution for a point source of charge 1 subject to the boundary conditions of the problem, i.e., for you case you get it by putting a unit charge somewhere inside the sphere at ##\vec{x}'## with ##|\vec{x}'|<R##.

Now I suppose the shell is grounded. Then you have to simply find the solution subject to the boundary condition
$$D(\vec{x},\vec{x}')|_{|\vec{x}|=R}=0.$$
For the field inside the sphere, i.e., for ##|\vec{x}|<R## you can put an image charge ##q''## at ##\vec{x}''## with ##|\vec{x}''|>R##. You have to adjust ##\vec{x}''## and ##q''## such that the boundary condition is fulfilled.

For the field outside the sphere, i.e., for ##|\vec{x}|>R## everywhere ##\Delta D=0## must hold with the sphere as equipotential surface. This can only be the Coulomb field with the unit charge in the origin.

Now you get the field for the line charge by
$$\vec{E}(\vec{x})=\int_0^{R/2} \mathrm{d} z' \lambda D(\vec{x},z' \vec{e}_z).$$
 
Point is the exercise does not ask for the field, but for the locus of the line charge. When I first saw this OP I was inclined to try and solve it along the lines of example 2 by Errede -- only inverted with the charge inside the spherical cavity and the mirror charge outside. Didn't work it out but still find it a good path to explore. Anyone agree ?
 
That should work. In fact if they only want the "locus" of the line charge I think you need only specify the two end points (it must be a line by symmetry)? It will not be uniform I believe but that is not the question..

Edit: I seem to have misread the question... apologies..
 
Last edited:
Ok, if they don't want the field and only the (net?) force, just calculate the image charge distribution, which you can of course do first for a point particle and then "smear" it along a line as a line-charge density. Then you have the original line-charge density (I assume it's along the 3-axis)
$$\rho(\vec{x})=\lambda \delta(x) \delta(y) \Theta(0\leq z \leq R/2)$$
and the mirror-charge distribution ##\rho'(\vec{x})##, which has support completely outside the fear. The net force then is
$$\vec{F}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d^3} x \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 x' \frac{\rho(\vec{x}) \rho'(\vec{x}')}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \, \frac{\vec{x}-\vec{x}'}{|\vec{x}-\vec{x}'|^3}.$$
 
Can @ebru follow all this ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
721
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K