Line Integral for Electromagnetic Force

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the derivation of the force exerted by a charged rod on a test charge using line integrals in the context of electricity and magnetism. Participants explore the mathematical formulation and the physical interpretation of the components involved in the equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on the transition from the integral form of force to a specific expression involving the components of the distance vector r.
  • Another participant questions the signs of the x and y components of the unit vector ##\hat r##, suggesting that the coordinate system influences these signs.
  • A suggestion is made to redraw the diagram to better understand the contributions of charge segments on either side of the midpoint and how they affect the net force.
  • One participant expresses a desire for clearer notation and definitions of the variables involved in the equations, indicating a need for better communication of the mathematical expressions.
  • A participant shares their success in using LaTeX for formatting equations and provides definitions for the variables used in the context of the problem.
  • There is an emphasis on the participant's motivation to learn electricity and magnetism, particularly in preparation for future coursework.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the mathematical expressions and physical concepts. There is no consensus on the interpretation of the components of the force or the derivation process, indicating multiple competing views and ongoing uncertainty.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note limitations in the clarity of the equations presented and the need for better explanations of the physical context. The discussion reflects a reliance on specific diagrams and coordinate systems that may not be universally understood by all participants.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and individuals interested in electricity and magnetism, particularly those looking to understand the mathematical foundations of force interactions in electrostatics.

gibberingmouther
Messages
120
Reaction score
15
http://web.mit.edu/sahughes/www/8.022/lec01.pdf

So I'm trying to understand how to get from F = ∫[(Q*λ)*dL*r]/(r^2) to F=∫q*λ*[(xx+ay)/(a^2+x^2)^(3/2)]*dx

Like I don't understand why the x and y components of r are negative, or why "The horizontal r component is obviously zero: for every element on the right of the midpoint, there is an element on the left whose force magnitude is equal, but whose horizontal component points in the opposite direction."

This was kind of a starting point for trying to understand some of the more "fundamental" Electricity and Magnetism equations and ideas, but I got stuck.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I cannot read your formulae well. You should also better explain the physics context the integrals are needed for. Maybe then we'll be able to help you with your problem.
 
gibberingmouther said:
I don't understand why the x and y components of r are negative
I assume you're referring to the unit vector ##\hat r## which he writes near the bottom of page 7: $$\hat r = -\hat x \cos \theta - \hat y \sin \theta$$ According to the diagram in the middle of the page, ##\hat r## starts at the charge segment dx and points downwards and to the left. His coordinate system is set up as xy systems usually are: x is positive to the right and negative to the left, y is positive upwards and negative downwards. This determines the signs on the components of ##\hat r##.

(Tip: to learn how to write equations "properly", see here: https://www.physicsforums.com/help/latexhelp/)

or why "The horizontal r component is obviously zero: for every element on the right of the midpoint, there is an element on the left whose force magnitude is equal, but whose horizontal component points in the opposite direction."

Draw a new version of the diagram in the middle of page 7, with a second charge segment dx located the same distance x from the midpoint, but on the left side. Draw the unit vector ##\hat r## associated with that second dx. Which way does it point, what are the signs on its x and y components, and how do they compare to the other dx? What happens when you add the contributions from the two dx's, as part of the integral on the next page?
 
Last edited:
gibberingmouther said:
So I'm trying to understand how to get from F = ∫[(Q*λ)*dL*r]/(r^2) to F=∫q*λ*[(xx+ay)/(a^2+x^2)^(3/2)]*dx
I cannot read your equations. Could you write them in LaTex and also explain what the variables are? What are x and L, what are Q and q, etc.
 
I figured out how to use Latex. I originally thought I had to use a separate program to format the Latex code but then I re-read the Latex Primer here on Physics Forums and realized that it is much easier than that!

So the math I was stuck on is:

##\vec F = \int (Q \times λ \times dl \times r)/(r^2)## somehow becomes ##\vec F = - \int_{-L/2}^{L/2} q \times λ \times [(x \times \hat x +a \times \hat y)/(a^2+x^2)^{3/2}] dx##

We have a rod of length L horizontally there in space with a charge Q smeared uniformly on it and a test charge q somewhere else with relation to it.

As for the variables
* ##\lambda## = Q / L = the line charge density
* Q is the value of the charge that is uniformly smeared on the rod
* q = value of the test charge in coulombs
* x is the horizontal axis and the rod smeared with charge we're talking about goes from -L/2 to L/2 where L is the length of the horizontal rod
* ##\hat r## is the length from the test charge to a point on the rod and ##\hat x## is the x component of that distance and ##\hat y## is the y component of it

I just want to start learning some real electricity and magnetism, mainly for fun. I plan to take the electricity and magnetism physics course next semester. So I started with this lecture PDF and I just want to get unstuck. My next physics course won't require calculus, but I want to learn the calculus based part of the physics too so I can eventually understand Maxwell's equations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
490
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
951
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K