Line integral of a spherical vector field over cartesian path

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around computing the line integral of a spherical vector field over a specified Cartesian path. The user initially parameterized the path but encountered complications, leading to a messy result involving logarithms and square roots. Another participant suggested using the z parameter for simplification, which proved to be easier. The user questioned whether the results should match when using spherical coordinates, noting a discrepancy in the final answer. The discussion highlights the importance of careful handling of line elements in spherical coordinates, particularly due to the singularity along the z-axis.
PeteyCoco
Messages
37
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Compute the line integral of

\vec{v} = (rcos^{2}\theta)\widehat{r} - (rcos\theta sin\theta)\widehat{\theta} + 3r\widehat{\phi}

over the line from (0,1,0) to (0,1,2) (in Cartesian coordinates)

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I expressed the path as a parametrized vector

\vec{r}(t) = \frac{1}{sint} \widehat{r} + t\widehat{\theta} + \frac{\pi}{2}, t:(arctan(1/2), pi/2)

the derivative of which is

\vec{r}'(t) = -\frac{cost}{sin^{2}t} \widehat{r} + \widehat{\theta}

I'm looking for the integral to be equal to 2, but whenever I work it out I get a mess of logarithms and square roots. Have I parameterized this the wrong way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi PeteyCoco! :smile:
PeteyCoco said:
… over the line from (0,1,0) to (0,1,2) (in Cartesian coordinates)

Wouldn't it be massively easier to use the parameter z ? :confused:

(and convert v to Cartesian)
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi PeteyCoco! :smile:


Wouldn't it be massively easier to use the parameter z ? :confused:

(and convert v to Cartesian)

Yeah, it was much simpler. Should I be able to get exactly the same answer if I work it out in terms of spherical coordinates though? When I did the arithmetic on the answer from that process I got something around 1.975 instead of 2. Is that due to poor math on my part or is the result off because of the unnatural fit of a line in spherical coordinates?
 
Hi PeteyCoco! :smile:

(just got up :zzz:)
PeteyCoco said:
Should I be able to get exactly the same answer if I work it out in terms of spherical coordinates though?

Yes, but you have to be very careful about the line element in spherical coordinates (I expect that's where you went wrong) …

in Cartesian corordinates, it's just dz, with no factors ! :wink:

If you want us to find your mistake (the answer should have been exactly the same), you'll have to type it out for us. :smile:
 
The z-axis is a coordinate singularity in standard spherical coordinates!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top