Linear Algebra - isomorphism questions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining whether various mappings in linear algebra are onto, one-to-one, and isomorphisms. For the mapping from R2 to R2 defined by f(x,y) = (x-2y, x+y), it is confirmed to be both onto and one-to-one. The mapping from R2 to R3 is not onto due to a zero row in the reduced matrix but is one-to-one. The mapping from R3 to P2(R) is both onto and one-to-one, while the mapping from Rmxn to Rnxm is also confirmed to be onto and one-to-one, with additional emphasis on the necessity of showing that these functions preserve operations to qualify as isomorphisms. The discussion highlights the importance of verifying both injectivity and surjectivity, along with the homomorphic property for isomorphism classification.
zeion
Messages
455
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Determine whether the following mappings f is onto or one-to-one. Is f an isomorphism?

a) f maps R2 into R2 and is defined by f(x,y) = (x-2y, x+y)

b) f maps R2 into R3 and is defined by f(x,y) = (x, y, x+y)

i) f maps R3 into P2(R), defined by f(a1, a2, a3) = a2 - a3x + (1-a1)x^2

j) f maps Rmxn into Rnxm and is defined by f(A) = A^T (transpose of A) for all A in Rmxn

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Can I solve this by forming the matrix of the output?
ie I have x-2y = 0 and x+y = 0 as a matrix and row reduce, I get a 2x2 identity matrix and therefore
1) There are always solution for any augmented matrix, so f is onto
2) There are no parameters in the matrix and both variables always have a unique solution for every augmented matrix, so f is one-to-one

Is that right?

For b)

I get form the 3x2 matrix and row reduce, then a have third row of zero and no parameter, therefore f is not onto since there will always be some component of R3 that has no solution (hence the zero row). But f is 1-1 since both variables always have a unique solution for any augmented matrix (hence it has 2 leading ones).

Does that explanation seem right?

For i)

I form the matrix and row reduce to a I3x3, therefore f is onto and 1-1.

For j)

f is one-to-one since it forms the transpose of A and every row of A is mapped to every column of the image once.
It is onto since this applies to every matrix of Rmxn, therefore transposed into every matrix of Rnxm.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
zeion said:

Homework Statement



Determine whether the following mappings f is onto or one-to-one. Is f an isomorphism?

a) f maps R2 into R2 and is defined by f(x,y) = (x-2y, x+y)

b) f maps R2 into R3 and is defined by f(x,y) = (x, y, x+y)

i) f maps R3 into P2(R), defined by f(a1, a2, a3) = a2 - a3x + (1-a1)x^2

j) f maps Rmxn into Rnxm and is defined by f(A) = A^T (transpose of A) for all A in Rmxn

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Can I solve this by forming the matrix of the output?
ie I have x-2y = 0 and x+y = 0 as a matrix and row reduce, I get a 2x2 identity matrix and therefore
1) There are always solution for any augmented matrix, so f is onto
2) There are no parameters in the matrix and both variables always have a unique solution for every augmented matrix, so f is one-to-one

Is that right?
Yes, although you don't need to do it with matrices. If a and b are any two numbers then we can solve f(x,y)= (a,b) as x- 2y= a, x+ y= b for x= (a+2b)/2, y= (a+b)/3, so this is onto. Also if f(x_1,y_1)= f(x_2,y_2), x_1- 2y_1= x_2- 2y_2, x_1+ y_1= x_2+ y_2, then x_1- x_2= y_2- y_1 from the first equation and x_2- x_1= -2(y_2- y_1). Then y_2- y_1= -2(y_2- y_1) which leads to y_1= y_2 and then x_1= x_2 showing that this function is one-to-one.

You still need to show that f((a,b)+ (c,d))= f((a,b))+ f((c,d)) and f(r(a,b))= rf(a,b) for all real numbers a, b, c, d, and r to show that this is an isomorphism.

For b)

I get form the 3x2 matrix and row reduce, then a have third row of zero and no parameter, therefore f is not onto since there will always be some component of R3 that has no solution (hence the zero row). But f is 1-1 since both variables always have a unique solution for any augmented matrix (hence it has 2 leading ones).

Does that explanation seem right?

For i)

I form the matrix and row reduce to a I3x3, therefore f is onto and 1-1.

For j)

f is one-to-one since it forms the transpose of A and every row of A is mapped to every column of the image once.
It is onto since this applies to every matrix of Rmxn, therefore transposed into every matrix of Rnxm.
You need to say a bit more. You can use the fact that the transpose is "dual". That is, that
(AT)T= A.

This function is onto because, given any matrix B, it is the transpose of BT. It is one-to-one because, if
AT= BT
then, taking the transpose of each side, A= B.

And, again, just showing that a function is one-to-one and onto is NOT enough to show that it is an isomorphism. You must also show that the function is a homormorphism- that it "preserves" the operations.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...

Similar threads

Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
69
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
12K
Back
Top