Linear Algebra- Kernel and images of a matrix

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationships between the kernel and image of a matrix A and its powers. It establishes that if A is invertible, then ker(A) and im(A) are trivial and span the entire space, respectively. For non-invertible matrices, it is concluded that ker(A) is a subset of ker(A^2), and similarly, im(A) contains im(A^2). The conversation emphasizes that while these sets are not necessarily equal, they exhibit a hierarchical structure as powers increase. Overall, the relationships between the kernels and images of matrix powers reveal important properties in linear algebra.
KyleS4562
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a square matrix A:

a. What is the relationship between ker(A) and ker(A^2)? Are they necessarily equal? Is one of them necessarily contained in the other? More generally, What can you say about ker(A), ker(A^2), ker(A^3), ker(A^4),...?

b. What can you say about im(A), im(A^2), im(A^3), im(A^4),...?


2. The attempt at a solution

So i believe if A is invertible nxn matrix, than ker(A)={<0,0,0>} and so will ker(A^2) and so on. And the image of A if A is invertible is im(A)=R^n and so will the im(A^2) and so on, but I am not sure what it would be for other conditions of A at least that's what I think this question wants.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a. If x \in \ker(A), what can you say about A^2 x? What does that tell you about \ker(A^2)?

b. For any x, A^2x is in \operatorname{im}(A^2). If you rewrite A^2x as A(Ax)=Ay, what can you say about \operatorname{im}(A)?
 
for A: A^2 * x would equal the zero vector which means the ker(A^2) contains x but is not necessarily equal because it may contain another vector

B. Is that saying the im(A) contains the im(A^2) but is not necessarily equal to the im(A^2) because it will span more vectors?
 
KyleS4562 said:
for A: A^2 * x would equal the zero vector which means the ker(A^2) contains x but is not necessarily equal because it may contain another vector

In other words, we have \ker(A)\subset \ker(A^2).

KyleS4562 said:
B. Is that saying the im(A) contains the im(A^2) but is not necessarily equal to the im(A^2) because it will span more vectors?

Yes. You could also write : \operatorname{im}(A^2)\subset \operatorname{im}(A)

Now, how can you apply this to \ker(A^3), \ker(A^4)... and \operatorname{im}(A^3), \operatorname{im}(A^4)...?
 
alright, thank you very much for your help
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
1K