Linear Algebra- Spanning Sets definition

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of bases in linear algebra, specifically whether certain sets of vectors can be considered bases for R³. The original poster questions if the set {e1, e2} can be a basis for R³, given that they understand {e1, e2, e3} is a basis. They also explore other sets of vectors, such as {(1,1,2)T, (2,2,5)T}, and express uncertainty about the definitions and implications of spanning sets and linear independence.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definition of a basis and the requirements for a set of vectors to span R³. They question how many vectors are needed and explore the implications of having fewer vectors than the dimension of the space. There is also a focus on understanding the relationship between linear independence and spanning sets.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the definitions and properties of bases. Some participants have offered clarifications regarding the dimensionality of vector spaces and the requirements for spanning. There is an ongoing exploration of the concepts without a clear consensus on the original poster's understanding.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the definitions of spanning sets and bases, with some expressing confusion about the implications of having fewer vectors than the dimension of the space. The original poster mentions a lack of clarity from their professor, indicating that they are working through these concepts independently.

Roni1985
Messages
200
Reaction score
0
Linear Algebra- Basis

Homework Statement



Is {e1,e2} a basis for R3 ?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I know that {e1,e2,e3} is a basis for R3

same here,

Is this one a basis for R3
{(1,1,2)T,(2,2,5)T}

I know that
{(1,1,2)T,(2,2,5)T,(3,4,1)T}
is a basis for R3.

Perhaps, I am a little unclear with the definition.

Would appreciate any help.

Roni
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you know that {e1,e2,e3} is a basis, then, by the definition of a basis...what can you say about {e1,e2}?
 
Following Tinyboss's lead, what is the definition of a basis?
 
Tinyboss said:
If you know that {e1,e2,e3} is a basis, then, by the definition of a basis...what can you say about {e1,e2}?

This is the part I don't understand...
 
Mark44 said:
Following Tinyboss's lead, what is the definition of a basis?

the vectors must be independent and they must span R^3

but say I have {e1,e2} only. they are independent and they span R^3 (they do span R^3, right?)
 
They are linearly independent but there are only two of them. How many vectors must there be in a basis for R^3?
 
Mark44 said:
They are linearly independent but there are only two of them. How many vectors must there be in a basis for R^3?

Well, the logic says 3, but I don't understand why 3 ?

and I guess if it's there {e1,e2} is missing 1 vector.
but why 3 ?
here is another example {(1,1,2)^T,(2,2,5)^T}

Thanks for your help.
 
The number of vectors in a basis for a vector space is equal to the dimension of the vector space. For R^1, any basis must have 1 vector, for R^2, any basis must have two vectors, and so on. If a set contains fewer vectors than the dimension of the vector space it needs to span, it can't possibly span the space, hence can't be a basis.

With your first example, where e1 = (1, 0, 0)^T and e2 = (0, 1, 0)^T, is there some linear combination of these vectors that generates (0, 2, 5)^T?
 
Mark44 said:
The number of vectors in a basis for a vector space is equal to the dimension of the vector space. For R^1, any basis must have 1 vector, for R^2, any basis must have two vectors, and so on. If a set contains fewer vectors than the dimension of the vector space it needs to span, it can't possibly span the space, hence can't be a basis.

With your first example, where e1 = (1, 0, 0)^T and e2 = (0, 1, 0)^T, is there some linear combination of these vectors that generates (0, 2, 5)^T?

I think I understand it...
I guess I'll need to sit on it a little more.

Thank you very much for your help:)
 
  • #10
Mark44 said:
If a set contains fewer vectors than the dimension of the vector space it needs to span, it can't possibly span the space, hence can't be a basis.


Now this part is confusing me.

So,
{e1,e2} can't span R^3 ?

Oh they must span R^2 with two rows only, right?

what about {(1,1,2)^T,(2,2,5)^T}, what do they span ? R^3?! ( they have two vectors) , R^2 ?! (they have 3 rows so they can't really span R^2, right?!)

Thanks.
 
  • #11
Roni1985 said:
Now this part is confusing me.

So,
{e1,e2} can't span R^3 ?

Oh they must span R^2 with two rows only, right?

Not exactly. In this context, e1 and e2 are elements of R^3, so they are NOT elements of R^2 and therefore cannot span R^2. They do span something that is very similar to R^2, though. Can you see what it is?

what about {(1,1,2)^T,(2,2,5)^T}, what do they span ? R^3?! ( they have two vectors) , R^2 ?! (they have 3 rows so they can't really span R^2, right?!)

Same deal here, the vectors are in R^3, so they aren't in R^2 and can't span R^2. Have you learned what a "subspace" is yet?
 
  • #12
jbunniii said:
Not exactly. In this context, e1 and e2 are elements of R^3, so they are NOT elements of R^2 and therefore cannot span R^2. They do span something that is very similar to R^2, though. Can you see what it is?



Same deal here, the vectors are in R^3, so they aren't in R^2 and can't span R^2. Have you learned what a "subspace" is yet?

We studied all this, but the professor wasn't really helpful, so everything is on me...
Let me see if I undertand.
{e1,e2} does span R^3 but it doesn't include ALL vectors in the plane that's created.
However,
{e1,e2,e3} also spans R^3 but it forms a solid which is spread throughout all R^3, therefore, it includes ALL vectors in R^3

and {e1} also spans R^3 but it forms a line and any combination of it must be on the line. However, there lots of vectors that are not on the line, therefore, this one cat be a basis for R^3 either.

Right?

Thanks a lot for your help.
 
  • #13
Roni1985 said:
We studied all this, but the professor wasn't really helpful, so everything is on me...
Let me see if I undertand.
{e1,e2} does span R^3 but it doesn't include ALL vectors in the plane that's created.

No, it does not span R^3. You need at least three vectors to do that.

{e1,e2} spans a 2-dimensional plane (subspace) contained within R^3.

Think of the x-y plane in Euclidean 3-space. That plane is spanned by two vectors, for example, the unit vectors in the x- and y-directions. The coordinates of these vectors are (1,0,0) and (0,1,0). This plane is not the same as R^2, where the vectors have only two coordinates. But it's equivalent in a certain mathematical sense (we say that the x-y plane within R^3 is ISOMORPHIC to R^2).

However,
{e1,e2,e3} also spans R^3 but it forms a solid which is spread throughout all R^3, therefore, it includes ALL vectors in R^3

This is what is meant by "spanning" R^3. ANY vector in R^3 can be formed by an appropriate linear combination of e1, e2, and e2. This is NOT true if you only use e1 and e2, and thus {e1,e2} does not span R^3.

and {e1} also spans R^3

No. It spans a one-dimensional line (subspace) contained in R^3. That line is isomorphic to R^1.

but it forms a line and any combination of it must be on the line. However, there lots of vectors that are not on the line, therefore, this one cat be a basis for R^3 either.

Right, it's not a basis for R^3, BECAUSE it does not span R^3.

There are two things that must be true in order for a set of vectors to be a basis for a vector space:

(1) the vectors must span the whole space
(2) the vectors must be linearly independent.

{e1,e2,e2} are linearly independent, and so are any subset of them, so (2) is not the problem here. But in order to achieve (1) you need to have enough vectors. R^3 has dimension 3, and that means you need at least 3 vectors to span it. Furthermore, you can't have MORE than 3 linearly independent vectors in a 3-dimensional space, so if the vectors are to form a basis (a stronger condition than simply spanning the space) you need to have exactly three (linearly independent) vectors.
 
  • #14
jbunniii said:
No, it does not span R^3. You need at least three vectors to do that.

{e1,e2} spans a 2-dimensional plane (subspace) contained within R^3.

Think of the x-y plane in Euclidean 3-space. That plane is spanned by two vectors, for example, the unit vectors in the x- and y-directions. The coordinates of these vectors are (1,0,0) and (0,1,0). This plane is not the same as R^2, where the vectors have only two coordinates. But it's equivalent in a certain mathematical sense (we say that the x-y plane within R^3 is ISOMORPHIC to R^2).



This is what is meant by "spanning" R^3. ANY vector in R^3 can be formed by an appropriate linear combination of e1, e2, and e2. This is NOT true if you only use e1 and e2, and thus {e1,e2} does not span R^3.



No. It spans a one-dimensional line (subspace) contained in R^3. That line is isomorphic to R^1.



Right, it's not a basis for R^3, BECAUSE it does not span R^3.

There are two things that must be true in order for a set of vectors to be a basis for a vector space:

(1) the vectors must span the whole space
(2) the vectors must be linearly independent.

{e1,e2,e2} are linearly independent, and so are any subset of them, so (2) is not the problem here. But in order to achieve (1) you need to have enough vectors. R^3 has dimension 3, and that means you need at least 3 vectors to span it. Furthermore, you can't have MORE than 3 linearly independent vectors in a 3-dimensional space, so if the vectors are to form a basis (a stronger condition than simply spanning the space) you need to have exactly three (linearly independent) vectors.

Oh, I think I got it...
{e1,e2} span some subspace which is part of R^3, but it doesn't span R^3 because I can't create any vector in R^3 with the linear combination of e1 and e2.

Thank you so much for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K