Linear Algebra thats needed in QM?

AI Thread Summary
Linear Algebra (LA) is essential for Quantum Mechanics (QM), but mastery of all theorems and properties is not required. Key topics include eigenvalues, eigenvectors, and understanding Hermitian operators, as these concepts frequently appear in QM. While Differential Equations (DE) are relevant, they are less emphasized; basic techniques like separation of variables are typically sufficient. Students often find that they learn necessary LA concepts organically while studying QM, making it unnecessary to have an in-depth understanding of LA before starting QM. A solid grasp of fundamental LA concepts, such as matrix operations and linear operators, is adequate for success in QM.
RasslinGod
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
Hi,

so I am currently taking LA + Diff. eqtns in one class right now. I am planning to take QM in the summer.

So I am wondering, how much of LA is needed for QM? My reason for askign this is that there are so many theorems and properties of matricis that i honestly can't master all of them, and i have difficulty understanding the proofs of many theorems. I'm wondering how much QM uses LA?

What are the topics that i need to have down solidly?
Also, are DE important in QM?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You'll going to use matrices and that eigenvalues/eigenvectors stuff quite a bit. IMO, I say I used more LA than DE in QM
 
Well, I don't know what your LA class covers, but eigenvalues and eigenvectors are important. Hamiltonian operators are nice to know, same with Hermitian Operators.

In reality, I think a lot of the LA you see will be knowing the language. I don't think anyone expects you to maser LA, but it's important to be comfortable speaking in those terms used in LA.
 
LA and Diff EQ's are important for QM, but I wouldn't worry too much. I had over a year's break between LA and QM and I still remembered enough to feel comfortable in the class.

Only the very basics will be used, things like taking a determinant, eigenvalues, eigenvectors, etc. The nice thing about QM is that all of your operators are Hermitian, so that limits what you will potentially use. Overall it's not that bad.

As for Diff EQ's, I've only had to "use" it a few times, and it was only in derivations. I've never had to actually use it to solve a problem. Well, none of the really complicated stuff. What you usually do is separation of variables, which is pretty easy, and solve from there.
 
They usually teach you all the LA you need in an advanced undergraduate QM class. All you need to get by is sophomore level LA. I've found that in QM, I learn a lot of LA without even being aware that I'm learning LA. I actually took an LA course after senior quantum. Every couple of days I'd find myself saying, "hey, I know about that!" So I don't think it's that important to worry about mastering LA before studying quantum. You need to know the basics, like matrix multiplication, linear operators, eigenstuff, etc. But that's about it.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top