Linear Algebra's purpose in a nutshell

  • Thread starter Thread starter torquemada
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear
AI Thread Summary
Linear algebra is crucial for engineering and science as it provides the tools to work with linear models, which are essential for analyzing complex systems. It allows for the simplification of nonlinear models through linear approximations, facilitating the study of change over time, similar to calculus. The discussion highlights that linear algebra is foundational in various applications, such as solving linear differential equations and performing transformations in computer graphics. For instance, it enables the manipulation of shapes and images in 2D and 3D spaces through linear transformations, making it integral to fields like computer vision and physics. The relationship between linear algebra and calculus is emphasized, particularly in how linear mappings and transformations underpin many mathematical operations and real-world applications.
torquemada
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
hey i was wondering if you can define it really quick in terms of practical applications. The way calculus is so important b/c it allows us to study change and analyze different snapshots in time of change. what makes LA so epic for engineering and science - what does it enable us to do that is so important - thx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Linear models are very common and also very simple. Linear algebra tells us how to deal with such models. Sometimes we use linear models directly, other times we use them to approximate a more complicated model, and sometimes we use the linear model as a base and build another model on top. Calculus is mostly about ussing limits to replace a nonlinear model with a linear one, integration and differentiation are both ways to linearize a non linear function, linear algebra shows us why we wanted a linear approximation annd what to do with it once we have it.
 
Polynomial algebra sounds like it would be the antithesis of linear. Instead, as a polynomial is linear in the coefficients a lot of it, e.g. discriminants and other invariants, is really linear.
 
Also, the theory of linear differential equations is firmly rooted in Linear Algebra. Remember that the general solution of an nth-order linear homogeneous equation is a linear combination of n linearly independent solutions... which is exactly how one obtains a whole vector (sub)space, adding up linear combinations of the basis elements.

The nonhomogeneous case isn't any different, as this time, we have to add a particular a solution to the general solution of the homogeneous equation. This is pretty much the same structure as that of an affine subspace (aka linear manifold),

S = \mathbf{p} + W,​

where W is a vector subspace and \mathbf{p} is any element of the original affine space. Here, \mathbf{p} acts as the particular solution of the original nonhomogeneous equation, and W is the general solution of the homogeneous equation.

Furthermore, the idea of linear mappings is heavily used in Calculus: for instance, to give a proper meaning to differentials, or as an indirect way to define a differentiable function, by requiring the existence of a certain linear mapping.
 
Linear Algebra provides most of the underlying theory that allows us to move an image matrix across the screen via transformations.

An example:

Let's say that I have a strange shape that I've defined. (More than likely it was created with respect to an origin). You want to move the shape on the screen.


( 1 , 0 , 0 , a ) ( x ) ( x+a )
( 0 , 1 , 0 , b ) ( y ) = ( y+b )
( 0 , 0 , 1 , c ) ( z ) ( z+c )
( 0 , 0 , 0 , 1 ) ( 1 ) ( 1 )

And anytime you want to warp an image.

What if you wanted to slam a 3D image into a 2D space?
There's a linear transformation for that.

What if you wanted to rotate a 3D image?
You can do that too.

What if you're working with ephemeral data, but you prefer cartesian coordinates?
Just slam that puppy into a Jacobian matrix and crank out your x, y and z.

Want to see what the crab nebula would look like traveling at .97c?
There's a linear transformation for that too.

This is how we use Linear Algebra. This is where all of those 12 page long proofs about linear vector spaces lead.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top