MHB Linear Applications: Electrical Networks

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a circuit problem to determine branch currents using assigned variables and equations. The user created three equations based on their circuit analysis but found a discrepancy between their calculated results and the book's solutions. The user’s derived currents are I1=35/13, I2=20/13, and I3=15/13, while the book states I1=5/7, I2=20/7, and I3=15/7. Another participant suggests that the user's equations are correct and that the book's solutions likely pertain to a different problem with different resistor values. The conclusion indicates that the initial setup of equations is not the issue, but rather the book's provided answers.
Pull and Twist
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
So I am having difficulty with the following problem;

Determine the currents in the various branches.

View attachment 5184

So I went ahead and assigned I names to the various branches and drew in flow directions to help me visualize the problem better.

From there I created the following three equations;

I1=I2+I3
2I1+3I2=10
2I1+4I3=10

Which I then put in a matrix and was able to reduce for the following solutions;

I1=35/13
I2=20/13
I3=15/13

The problem is that the book states that I should be getting;

I1=5/7
I2=20/7
I3=15/7

Where am I going wrong in setting up my equations? I know I'm not messing up going to RREF form cause my calculator is giving me the same answer. I figure I must be screwing up the initial equations.
 

Attachments

  • problem_1.jpg
    problem_1.jpg
    10.5 KB · Views: 100
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi PullandTwist,

I believe your equations and solution are fine.
The stated book solution is wrong.
It looks as if it belongs to a similar problem with different resistors.
For instance with resistors $2\ \Omega, 2\ \Omega, 6\ \Omega$ and voltage $10\ \textrm{V}$.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top