Linear Approximation of F(x) at x=1.001

mastermechanic
Messages
107
Reaction score
15
<Moved from a technical section and thus a template variation>

1-) Question:
Let f, g and h be differentiable everywhere functions with h(1) = 2 , h'(1) = - 3 , g(2) = -1 , g'(2) = 5 , f(-1) = 4 , f'(-1) = 7. Approximate the value of function F(x) = f(g(h(x))) at point x= 1.001

2-) My attempt: I think it's linear approximation question. I've generated the main functions by assuming their derivative as their slope.

If $$ h(1)=2 , h'(1) = -3 , (1,2) h(x) = -3x+5$$
If $$ g(2) = -1 , g'(2) = 5 , (2,-1) g(x) = 5x-11 $$
If $$ f(-1) = 4 , f'(-1) = 7 , (-1,4) f(x) = 7x+11$$

So $$ F(x) = f(g(h(x))) = [ 7[ 5 (-3x + 5) - 11 ] +11] $$

$$ F(x) = -105x + 109 $$
$$F(1.001) = 3.895 $$

Is it correct?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think your method is correct, but you've made at least two mistakes. Try checking your expression for F(x) by calculating F(1) and comparing it to f(g(h(1))), which you know. Also, how did you get from your expression for F(x) to the final answer?
 
It looks like the question is set up for an application of the chain rule. Are you supposed to know the chain rule at this point or is this question preparation for introducing it.
 
phyzguy said:
I think your method is correct, but you've made at least two mistakes. Try checking your expression for F(x) by calculating F(1) and comparing it to f(g(h(1))), which you know. Also, how did you get from your expression for F(x) to the final answer?
I reached the final equation by putting each function to inside other one.
Thanks for your caution, I've realized that I made some multiplication mistake. When I fixed it , I got $$ F(x) = -105x + 109 $$ and if we put the x=1.001 value get 3.895 which totally make sense now, because as you said when I assumed x as 1 h(1) = 2 g(2) = -1 and f(-1) = 4 so it is too close.

Thanks :)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top