Linear dependence/independence

  • Thread starter Thread starter masterofthewave124
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concepts of linear dependence and independence among vectors, specifically examining the relationships between vectors u, v, w, and z. It concludes that -2v and 4z are linearly dependent with u, while 3w is linearly independent, and 3v + 4z is also linearly dependent. The participants clarify that scalar coefficients in front of vectors simply scale them without affecting their direction. Additionally, they discuss the division of a line segment, noting that A divides BC in a 2:1 ratio, and both internal and external divisions are possible depending on the context. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding vector relationships and the implications of scalar multiples.
masterofthewave124
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
Given that and u||v, v is not parallel with w and z= −3u state (with reasons) whether the following vectors are linearly dependent with u.

a) -2v -> LD since u is parallel with v, u must be also parallel with 2v

b) 3w -> LI since u is parallel with v and v isn't parallel with w, w is also not parallel with u

c) 4z -> LD since u is parallel with v and v is parallel with z (z is just a scalar mutliple of u anyways), z must be parallel with u

d) 3v + 4z -> LD since v and z are parallel with each other and both are parallel with u, any combination of v and z is parallel with u

can someone check these for me? the coefficients infront of the vectors have no real siginificance right?, there just scalar multiples? if they do, then i screwed up big time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
different topic (division of a line) but i don't want to pollute the board with new threads.

1. State the ratio into which A divides BC. Indicate whether the division is internal or external.

a) BA = 2/3(BC)

is this question worded right? because you get BA/BC = 2/3 which really means B divides AC externally in the ratio 2:3. also, usually if C divides AB externally, the ratio would be AC:CB, which means one of them is negative. that's the second problem with this question even if the wording is incorrect.
 
For the first question, I don't find anything wrong with your answers.
Remember that a scalar coefficient in front of a vector, simply scales the vector by some measure while maintaining its direction .

For the second question, if you are not talking of vectors, but merely scalars or line segments, both the answers are possible . However if it is vectors the situation changes and there is only one answer .
Before I explain, could you please clarify further .
 
I don't understand why you are worrying about "B divides AC externally" or "C divides AB externally". The problem asked in what ratio A divides BC. Clearly, A is 2/3 of the way from B to C and so divides BC 2 to 1. (BA is twice as long as AC)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy: yes thanks for clarifying, i needed to draw a diagram to visualize.

B______________A______C

it would look something like that i suppose.
 
It can also be something like

A________B_______________C

Note that in this case too BA = 2/3 BC and division is external and in which case AB/BC = (2/3)/(1+2/3) = 2/5 .Thus both internal and external division are possible as I said in my earlier post.
Now had it been
\vec{BA} = \frac{2}{3}\vec{BC}
the situation would have been different .
Can you see how ? ;)
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top