Linear Dependence of Matrix Vectors

zplot
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I need to prove that the set {I, A, A^2,..., A^n} is linear dependent where A is any nxn matrix. The vector space is the set of nxn matrix, considered as a nxn dimensional vector space.

Does anybody have an idea how to prove it?
Thank you very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well I maybe wrong but to get you started:

I is in the nxn vector space and all the other matrices A, A^2, ..A^n

You might start by showing the linear combinations of matrices to get I and then relate that to the matrices A, of which matrices' can be written as nxn A^n=PA(^n)P^(-1)
 
Well, I tried to write A=P^(-1) J P where J is a Jordan matrix. Even more, I also tried to put J=N + D where N is nilpotent such that N^n=0 and D diagonal but I could not prove that the set is linear dependent. Thank you for your help. I f you have any further details or ideas I would be pleased.
 
At the end I arrived at the right solution. (A-lambda I)^k must be zero for some k<n. It comes from the Jordan canonical matrix, where lambda belongs to its spectrum. Logically then, the set {I, A, A^2,..., A^n} is linear dependent.

Thank you
 
An alternative method, which gives you the exact dependence right off the bat, is to use the Cayley-Hamilton theorem. The characteristic polynomial is of degree at most n, and is satisfied by the matrix.
 
Great! Thats certainly a much better, simpler and more elegant solution.
Thank you very much, Henry.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top