How to Determine Electric Displacement in a Linear Dielectric Capacitor?

stunner5000pt
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Griffith's Problem 4.18
The space between the plates of a parallel-plate capacitor (in the figure) is filled
with two slabs of linear dielectric material. Each slab has thickness a, so the total distance between the plates is 2a. Slab 1 has a dielectric constant of 2, and slab 2 has a dielectric constant of 1.5. The free charge density on the top plate is sigma and on the bottom plate -sigma.Find the electric displacement D in each slab.


Homework Equations


Gauss law for dielectrics
\int D \cdot dA = Q_{f,enc}

The Attempt at a Solution



In the diagram i have posted, the top and bottom 'gaps' are the metal slabs that make up this capacitor.
For the electric displacement in the top slab where epsilon = 2
The free charge on the upper boundary of this slab is +sigma. But there is some charge going to be present within the slab as well... but that's bound charge right... so we need not worry?
The electric displacement is just +sigma for this slab. but what is the direction? I am tempted to say that it points downward because it only seems natural (positive to negative) but what if there were no negative charge involved in the question? What then?

What if in the question the bottom slab was of some charge +sigma? The free charge on the top slab is still sigma but would the direction of D be pointing downward?

Thanks for your help and input.
 

Attachments

  • 1.JPG
    1.JPG
    11 KB · Views: 586
Physics news on Phys.org
D=\sigma, and D_n is continuous.
D is straight down if fringing is neglected.
If both plates had +Q, everything is different.
D would flare out on each side.
By Gauss's law, D would have to be large outside.
 
clem said:
D=\sigma, and D_n is continuous.
D is straight down if fringing is neglected.
If both plates had +Q, everything is different.
D would flare out on each side.
By Gauss's law, D would have to be large outside.

so D is just like an electric field ... but how is it different??
 
Outside the dielectric D and E should be the same, and are in gaussian units.
In SI, they are given different units for some reason.
Inside the dielectric D=epsilon E.
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top