Linear function (difficult for me, SAT Math II level)

rainyrabbit
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
If point P(m,2m) is 5 units from the line 12x+5y=1, m could equal
a. 43/11
b.-3
c.-65/22
d.5
e.3

The answer is E.


Explanation given in book:
- distance = abs(12(m) + 5(2m) -1) / root(144+25) = 5.
>>> m=3 or -32/11

I do not understand this explanation (of course finding m from the equation provided in the explanation is no problem, but I don't know how this equation was set up). Could you please help me out?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
root(144+25)=13

solve for m.
 
rainyrabbit said:
I do not understand this explanation (of course finding m from the equation provided in the explanation is no problem, but I don't know how this equation was set up). Could you please help me out?

It uses the following well know a formula for the perpendicular distance from a point to a line.

The distance "d" from the point (x1,y1) to the line ax+by+c=0 is given by :

d = |a x1 + b y1 + c| / sqrt(a^2 + b^2)
 
BTW there are quite a few differnet methods you can use to come up with a formula for the distance from a point to a line. The one quoted above is popular but I prefer the following because it has a simple one line proof based on similar triangles.

The distance from a given point to the line y=mx + b is given by,

d = v/sqrt(m^2+1), where v is the vertical distance from the point to the line.
 
Thank you very much, uart! I greatly appreciate your help.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top