MHB Linear Independence: Solving u,v,w Vector Questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yankel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello

I need some help solving the next question:

u,v,w are linearly independent vectors in a vector space V.

the vectors:

2u+4v+aw
u+2v
2u+bv

are linearly independent when:

1. a is not 0
2. b is not 4
3. a is not 0 OR b is not 4
4. a is not 0, and every value of b
5. a is not 0 AND b is not 4

first of all I noticed that answers 1 and 4 are the same.

I also know that x*v+y*u+z*w=0 implies x=y=z=0

but what next ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
what do you mean by b not equal to 4, b is a vector no?
 
Yankel said:
2u+4v+aw
u+2v
2u+b

According to the possible solutions, the third vector should be $2u+bv$. We have:
$$\lambda_1(2u+4v+aw)+\lambda_2(u+2v)+\lambda_3(2u+bv)=0\Leftrightarrow\\(2\lambda_1+\lambda_2+2 \lambda_3)u+(4\lambda_1+2\lambda_2+b\lambda_3)v+(a\lambda_1)w=0\qquad (1)$$
By hyphothesis, $u,v,w$ are linearly independent so, $(1)$ is satisfied if and only if:
$$\left\{\begin{matrix}2\lambda_1+\lambda_2+2 \lambda_3=0\\4\lambda_1+2\lambda_2+b\lambda_3=0\\a\lambda_1=0\end{matrix}\right.\qquad (2)$$
The homogeneous linear system $(2)$ has only the trivial solution if and only if:
$$\mbox{rank }\begin{bmatrix}{2}&1&{2}\\{4}&{2}&{b}\\{a}&{0}&{0}\end{bmatrix}=3\Leftrightarrow\begin{vmatrix}{2}&1&{2}\\{4}&{2}&{b}\\{a}&{0}&{0}\end{vmatrix}\neq 0\Leftrightarrow a(b-4)\neq 0\Leftrightarrow a\neq 0\wedge b\neq 4$$
The correct answer is 5., $a$ is not $0$ and $b$ is not $4$.
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top