Linear measurement of a curved part

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenges of measuring the diameter of a curved part, as traditional vernier calipers are ineffective for non-parallel surfaces. Various measurement methods are proposed, including using a coordinate measurement machine (CMM), optical profilometers, and point micrometers with jigs for accuracy. The feasibility of these methods depends on production volume, as higher accuracy often incurs greater costs. The conversation also touches on the potential for using laser distance sensors for precise measurements along the curvature. Ultimately, the participants are exploring practical solutions for measuring the part's dimensions effectively.
vin300
Messages
602
Reaction score
4
Below is a part proposed to be manufactured. The inspection of this part poses a problem, because vernier callipers only measure distances between parallel surfaces.
3d.PNG
I know there is some photographic method of measuring distances, however I would like to know is there no way of physically measuring the diameter along the curvature.
 

Attachments

  • 3d.PNG
    3d.PNG
    3.4 KB · Views: 833
Engineering news on Phys.org
classic method would be an open set up using granite surface plate and a digital height stand to measure various points along the long axis. Coordinate measurement machine is the typical solution. google CMM.
 
  • Like
Likes Asymptotic
If you just want to measure the diameter in the middle, you could use a point micrometer:
upload_2018-3-18_17-35-34.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-3-18_17-35-34.png
    upload_2018-3-18_17-35-34.png
    43.4 KB · Views: 537
Build a jig to keep the product directly under a Dial Indicator .

g9849-4601194499897ab30da5db941816d63b.jpg
 

Attachments

  • g9849-4601194499897ab30da5db941816d63b.jpg
    g9849-4601194499897ab30da5db941816d63b.jpg
    21.6 KB · Views: 541
Thanks. I'll have to enquire about the feasibility of these methods. I think using the micrometer would be cumbersome.
 
Are you manufacturing hundreds of these parts? And would they all need to be measured for accuracy? If so then then a Tom.G suggested, having some kind of jig built would be my suggestion, though I would use two laser distance sensors to give an accurate thickness, or in this case diameter, in this case I assume you would have to make multiple measurements along the edge. The cost of such a setup would only really be feasible if you are producing enough quantities to justify, also greater accuracy = greater price.
 
I'm being told the CMM isn't absolutely necessary, an optical profilometer that is used to measure roughness would do fine. I'm about to find out soon if it does.
Tolklein said:
Are you manufacturing hundreds of these parts? And would they all need to be measured for accuracy? If so then then a Tom.G suggested, having some kind of jig built would be my suggestion, though I would use two laser distance sensors to give an accurate thickness, or in this case diameter, in this case I assume you would have to make multiple measurements along the edge.
It is a large quantity but I'm only going to inspect some samples.
In the beginning I had mentioned physical measurement, but I'm seeing what works.
 
Last edited:
i have sold cmms since 1980 and was product manager for the original Profilometer. patented product.
what dimensions do you need to measure and to what accuracy?
it total measurement time a consideration?
 
It looks to me like a round bar is machined to a reduced diameter over a length near the centre, with a conical transition on either side.
I see no reason why a Go/NoGo profile template cannot be made. Exactly what shape it it?
What is the material, is it machined in a lathe or injection moulded? How about putting some dimensions on it.
 
  • #10
Done. They were skeptical at first. Then one person used the profilometer. The bar was kept on a V block over the device table. The table could be controlled by a computer and joystick on two axes. By taking reference of the end face, diameter at any distance was measured by focusing the image.
Baluncore said:
It looks to me like a round bar is machined to a reduced diameter over a length near the centre, with a conical transition on either side.
It is not conical but circular.
 

Attachments

  • Like
Likes Tom.G
Back
Top