Linear momentum as a vector - help

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of linear momentum as a vector, particularly focusing on how to add momentum vectors when they are not aligned along the same line. The original poster is exploring the implications of having two objects with momentum vectors that are parallel but not collinear, questioning the validity of vector addition in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the addition of momentum vectors when they are parallel but not on the same line, raising questions about the implications of their positions. Some participants discuss the properties of vectors and momentum, noting that momentum is proportional to velocity and can be added regardless of the objects' positions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the nature of momentum vectors and their addition. There is an exploration of the distinction between linear momentum and angular momentum, indicating a productive direction in understanding the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of vector addition in the context of linear momentum, particularly in relation to the positions of the objects involved. The original poster's inquiry reflects a common point of confusion regarding vector operations in physics.

allok
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
hi

I'm really stuck and I hope you can help me.


I know that linear momentum is a vector, but I'm still not sure how to add them together when :

p1, p2, p ... linear momentum

If two objects A1 ( p1 = 100) and A2 ( p2 = -100) represent an isolated system and are moving along ( parallel to ) x-axis ( A1 in positive and A2 in negative direction ), then total linear momentum p is zero. But what if A1 is still moving along the x axis, but this time function of object A1 is y(x) = 3, while before it was y(x) = 0. Then even though linear momentum vectors p1 and p2 are still parallel, they no longer lie on the same line. Can we still add vectors p1 and p2 as if they were lying on the same line? If yes, why? If not, why not?



thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, remember that vectors can be "moved" (the mathematician in me cringes at that) and the total momentum of the system can be calculated as the sum of the two objects even if they are not at the same point (strictly speaking two distinct objects can never be at the same spot!).
 
HallsofIvy said:
Yes, remember that vectors can be "moved"



I know vectors can be 'moved', but why is this allowed with momentum vectors? Clearly, a system containing two objects with their veclocity vectors lying on same line differs ( somehow ) from system with velocity vectors parallel, but not lying on the same line. Why would we choose to neglect the fact that vectors ain't lying on the same line?
 
Why would we choose to neglect the fact that vectors ain't lying on the same line?
We are not neglecting that fact.

Momentum is proportional to velocity, which is a vector.

Let [itex]\vec{v_1}\,=\,v_{1x}\hat{x}\,+\,\,v_{1y}\hat{y}[/itex],

and [itex]\vec{v_2}\,=\,v_{2x}\hat{x}\,+\,\,v_{2y}\hat{y}[/itex]

the

[itex]\vec{v_1}\,+\,\vec{v_2}\,=\,(v_{1x}\,+\,v_{2x})\hat{x}\,+\,(v_{1y}\,+\,v_{2y})\hat{y}[/itex].

If there is no velocity in the y direction, or if v1y = -v2y, then the sum is obviously zero, and there is not net momentum in that direction. Adding these vectors does not involve the positions of the objects with those velocities.

Now there is a property called angular momentum, which does involve the position or location of objects. Colinear particles with the same magnitude but opposite direction would have zero net linear momentum and zero net angular momentum, but non-colinear forces while having no net linear momentum would have a net angular momentum for the same velocity conditions.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
335
Views
17K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
14K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K