Linear Operator L with Zero Matrix Elements

AI Thread Summary
A linear operator L that satisfies <A|L|A> = 0 for every state A implies that all matrix elements <B|L|A> must also equal zero. The initial attempts to prove this using the resolution of identity were incorrect due to the misuse of state notation, where the same state was denoted for both sides of the equation. A correct approach involves recognizing that since <A|L|A> is zero for all states, the completeness relation must be applied without reusing the same state label. Ultimately, this leads to the conclusion that L must be the zero operator. The discussion emphasizes the importance of careful notation and understanding the implications of operator properties in quantum mechanics.
sayebms
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose a linear operator L satisfies <A|L|A> = 0 for every state A. Show that then all matrix elements <B|L|A> = 0, and hence L = 0.

Homework Equations


##<A|L|A>=L_{AA} and <B|L|A>=L_{BA}##

The Attempt at a Solution


It seems very straight forward and I don't know how to prove it but here is what I have tried:
##<B|L|A> \to##Using resolution of Identity ##\to \sum_{A} <B|A><A|L|A> \to <B|L|A>=0##
Is it right or do I need to write more.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is not correct, you are summing over A and at the same time assuming that ##|A\rangle## is a fixed state (i.e., the one you started with in ##\langle B|L|A\rangle##).
 
since the problems says for every state A so should I write as following ##<A_i|L|A_i>=0 \to ## then as before
## <B_j|L|A_i>=\sum_{i}<B_j|A_i><A_i|L|A_i>=0##
is it right now?
 
No, it is still wrong. You cannot let the state you are summing over in the completeness relation be denoted by the same as the state you have on the left-hand side. It is simply not correct.
 
should I solve it without the resolution of Identity?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top